2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2013.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple and highly efficient method to identify the integration site of a transgene in the animal genome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonly used method for identification of transgene insertion sites is based on inverse PCR (iPCR) (10,11). This method relies on knowledge of appropriate restriction sites located in the transgene and on sequence information to design appropriate primers for the iPCR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used method for identification of transgene insertion sites is based on inverse PCR (iPCR) (10,11). This method relies on knowledge of appropriate restriction sites located in the transgene and on sequence information to design appropriate primers for the iPCR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ai14 ( Rosa26-CAG-loxp-stop-loxp-tdTomato ) (Guenthner et al 2013), TetO-Cre (Uemura et al 2014), TetO-H2BGFP (Chakkalakal et al 2012) and Albumin-Cre (Cui et al 2016) mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. All mice were housed in an SPF environment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most are forms of PCR, including inverse PCR (iPCR), ligation-mediated PCR, and linear amplification PCR (LAM-PCR). 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 These methods each involve using restriction enzymes to digest the input DNA, which is then ligated to terminal adapter sequences. Therefore, these methods are limited to detecting integration events proximal to the chosen restriction enzyme(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%