2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2015.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple and general approach to fitting the discount curve under no-arbitrage constraints

Abstract: We suggest a simple and general approach to fitting the discount curve under no-arbitrage constraints based on a penalized shape-constrained B-spline. Our approach accommodates B-splines of any order and fitting both under the L 1 and the L 2 loss functions. Simulations and an empirical analysis of US STRIPS data from 2001-2009 suggest that an active knot search and splines of order three and four are mandatory to obtain reasonable fits. The loss function appears to be less relevant.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leitenstorfer and Tutz (2007) considered the use of monotone B-splines in generalized additive models. For other applications of monotone B-splines, one can refer to Kanungo, Gay, and Haralick (1995) and Fengler and Hin (2014). In addition, Eilers and Marx (1996) proposed a flexible class of P-splines.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leitenstorfer and Tutz (2007) considered the use of monotone B-splines in generalized additive models. For other applications of monotone B-splines, one can refer to Kanungo, Gay, and Haralick (1995) and Fengler and Hin (2014). In addition, Eilers and Marx (1996) proposed a flexible class of P-splines.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been investigated by among other Barzanti and Corradi (1999), Ramponi (2003), Chiu et al (2008). The relationship of shape and monotonicity restrictions with no-arbitrage conditions is detailed for example in the recent literature, see Laurini and Moura (2010) and Fengler and Hin (2015). Additional motivations of the use of monotonicity constraints will be developed in the numerical Section 5.4.…”
Section: Kriging Under Additional Monotonicity Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barzanti and Corradi (1998) use tension splines where the tension in the spline is increased manually until problematic behaviour is avoided. Chiu et al (2008), Laurini andMoura (2010), andFengler andHin (2015), among others, impose shape constraints on the B-splines used to represent the discount function. The discount curve produced by our method is not guaranteed to be positive or monotonic non-increasing, however we did not find this to be a problem in the numerical examples we have explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%