2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple and efficient text matching model based on deep interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MAP(%) and MRR(%) of the model on the WikiQA test set.Results marked with l are reported by Tay et al[35], m are reported by Yu et al[36] , e are reported by Wang et al[24], f are reported by Chen et al[25], g are reported by Yang et al[13] …”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The MAP(%) and MRR(%) of the model on the WikiQA test set.Results marked with l are reported by Tay et al[35], m are reported by Yu et al[36] , e are reported by Wang et al[24], f are reported by Chen et al[25], g are reported by Yang et al[13] …”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed model, we compare MGMSN with six current mainstream text matching algorithms, they are Deep Structured Semantic Model (DSSM) ( Huang et al (2013) ), Siamese LSTM network (Siamese LSTM) ( Neculoiu et al (2016) ), Attention-Based Convolutional Neural Network for Modeling Sentence Pairs (ABCNN) ( Yin et al (2016) ), Enhance Sequential Inference Model (ESIM) ( Greff et al (2016) ), Deep Interactive Text Matching (DITM) model ( Yu C. et al (2021) ), and Frame-based Multi-level Semantics Representation (FMSR) model ( Guo et al (2021) ).…”
Section: Experiments Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DITM (Yu et al, 2021): The model utilizes a multiple iterative interaction module coupled with a multiperspective pooling layer to capture the interaction information between short texts comprehensively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the length limitation of the texts, existing models for short‐text matching cannot accurately understand the semantic meaning of critical words with limited contextual information, leading to decreased performance. Compared with the interaction‐based approaches, for example, ESIM (Chen et al, 2017), RE2 (Yang et al, 2019), ESAN (Hu et al, 2020), and DITM (Yu et al, 2021), the proposed model has significantly improved the performance of short‐text matching due to external knowledge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation