2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2018.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple and efficient numerical procedure to compute the inverse Langevin function with high accuracy

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since there is no known closed form, and accuracy in the evaluation is extremely important [51], several approximants have been proposed in the last years [52,53,54,55,56,57]. Comparisons are given in [55] and [44]. The most accurate approximant is given in [44], using a spline-based approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since there is no known closed form, and accuracy in the evaluation is extremely important [51], several approximants have been proposed in the last years [52,53,54,55,56,57]. Comparisons are given in [55] and [44]. The most accurate approximant is given in [44], using a spline-based approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or a description employing the Inverse Langevin function are better for a global representation of the chain behavior, then, these functions may be best-fitted to the obtained P ch (λ ch ) behavior. Moreover, for the extrapolation domain when using B-splines, any of these functions may be appended at the end of the interpolation domain following a similar approach as that employed in [44] for the Inverse Langevin function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cohen approximation (Cohen 1991) has a maximum relative error of 0.0494 and improved approximations with maximum relative errors approaching 10 -4 Arruda 2015, Jedynak 2018) have been reported with the recent work of Marchi and Arruda (2019) detailing approximations with maximum relative errors less than 10 -6 . Benitez and Montáns (2018) utilized discretization and interpolation via cubic splines to obtain highly accurate numerical results; a maximum relative error of the order of 10 -11 can be achieved with the use of 10,000 points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is difficult to accurately evaluate the inverse Langevin function because of the asymptotic behavior near locking. Thus, some studies are dedicated to this issue [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]. However, in the present case, it is relevant to separate the Gaussian linear zone from the nonlinear locking one.…”
Section: Non-affine Model With Three Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%