2022
DOI: 10.3390/s22062234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple and Efficient Method for Finger Vein Recognition

Abstract: Finger vein recognition has drawn increasing attention as one of the most popular and promising biometrics due to its high distinguishing ability, security, and non-invasive procedure. The main idea of traditional schemes is to directly extract features from finger vein images and then compare features to find the best match. However, the features extracted from images contain much redundant data, while the features extracted from patterns are greatly influenced by image segmentation methods. To tackle these p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, it achieves a lower EER score in the FVUSM (0.03%), UTFVP (0.43%), and MMCBNU_6000 (1.80%) datasets. In comparison to other existing methodologies, such as deep segmentation (DS) [4], BACS-LBP [6], Lu et al [7], BMSU-LBP [9], and FVR-Net [24], SE-DenseNet-HP outperforms them by consistently achieving superior EER performance. Note that these methodologies exhibit varying degrees of EERs across different datasets, whereas SE-DenseNet-HP consistently stands out with its lower EER values across all datasets, validating the effectiveness of our proposed finger vein recognition system.…”
Section: Testing Stagementioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, it achieves a lower EER score in the FVUSM (0.03%), UTFVP (0.43%), and MMCBNU_6000 (1.80%) datasets. In comparison to other existing methodologies, such as deep segmentation (DS) [4], BACS-LBP [6], Lu et al [7], BMSU-LBP [9], and FVR-Net [24], SE-DenseNet-HP outperforms them by consistently achieving superior EER performance. Note that these methodologies exhibit varying degrees of EERs across different datasets, whereas SE-DenseNet-HP consistently stands out with its lower EER values across all datasets, validating the effectiveness of our proposed finger vein recognition system.…”
Section: Testing Stagementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Table 4 presents an EER comparison of SE-DenseNet-HP with FVR-Net, deep segmentation (DS) [4], BACS-LBP [6], Lu et al [7], and BMSU-LBP [9]. EER values for DS, BACS-LBP, Lu et al and BMSU-LBP were adapted from [4,6,7,9] respectively. When evaluated on the HKPU dataset, SE-DenseNet-HP surpasses other methods by achieving an EER of 1.81%.…”
Section: Testing Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The table clearly explains that the CASIA Multispectral imagery dataset achieved a higher performance (PSNR = 25.19@after processing and RMSE = 0.055@after processing) than others. So far, most IQA approaches [23][24][25][26] published are based on subjective quality measures. This experiment potentially concludes that PSNR and obtaining a contrast image are compatible.…”
Section: Image Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the different ways of finger vein feature extraction, finger vein recognition methods can be divided into 5 categories: Vein Pattern Methods,Feature Points Matching Methods,Statistical Characteristic Analysis Methods,Local Features Methods and Deep Learning Methods [1]. Vein pattern methods mainly use various algorithms to extract vein patterns from the pre-processed finger vein images and then compare the geometry or topology of the finger vein patterns to discern whether several finger vein images are from the same finger.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%