2016
DOI: 10.1109/temc.2015.2481891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Significance Test for Reverberation-Chamber Measurement Uncertainty in Total Radiated Power of Wireless Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to determine the power radiated by the DUT, it is necessary to determine the chamber's reference power transfer function REF ,, N M F G , averaged over F frequencies, N stirrer orientations, and M antenna positions, as measured by a measurement antenna whose efficiency (eMEAS) is known. As in [12], we define average received power as:…”
Section: Estimating Measurement Uncertainty Of Total Radiated Powmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In order to determine the power radiated by the DUT, it is necessary to determine the chamber's reference power transfer function REF ,, N M F G , averaged over F frequencies, N stirrer orientations, and M antenna positions, as measured by a measurement antenna whose efficiency (eMEAS) is known. As in [12], we define average received power as:…”
Section: Estimating Measurement Uncertainty Of Total Radiated Powmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, [12]. The chamber's reference power transfer function may then be estimated from S-parameter measurements and written as: Note that the received power at the receiver assembly in (4) is pre-corrected for known receiver effective efficiency (ηRX) and reflection coefficient (ΓRX) [28]:…”
Section: Estimating Measurement Uncertainty Of Total Radiated Powmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations