2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Signer Independent Sign Language Recognition with Co-articulation Elimination from Live Videos: An Indian Scenario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recorded video clips of continuing signed letters were processed according to our proposed method, and experimental results in average accuracy rate are shown in Table III. In that table, the experimental results of our proposed method are compared with conventional methods based on isolated signed letters using forehand in 2D [10] and 3D [19], and backhand in 2D [22], as shown in the to 4 ℎ rows, and continuous signed letters using forehand in 2D [42,43] and 3D [46], as shown in the 5 ℎ to 7 ℎ rows. The experimental results of the proposed method based on backhand view in 3D is allocated in the bottom row.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recorded video clips of continuing signed letters were processed according to our proposed method, and experimental results in average accuracy rate are shown in Table III. In that table, the experimental results of our proposed method are compared with conventional methods based on isolated signed letters using forehand in 2D [10] and 3D [19], and backhand in 2D [22], as shown in the to 4 ℎ rows, and continuous signed letters using forehand in 2D [42,43] and 3D [46], as shown in the 5 ℎ to 7 ℎ rows. The experimental results of the proposed method based on backhand view in 3D is allocated in the bottom row.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To show the improvement in accuracy of each signed letter, recognition results of the proposed method are compared with conventional methods, as shown in Table IV. The average accuracy rates of each signed letter performed by conventional methods using isolated signed letter in 2D for forehand [10], and backhand [22], and forehand in 3D [19] are shown in columns 2-4, and the ones with the method using continuous signed letters for forehand in 2D [43] are revealed in the 5 ℎ column. Finally, the accuracy of each signed letter and its standard deviation performed by the proposed method are introduced in the 6 ℎ and the last columns.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional approach to HGR involves extraction of spatial or spatio-temporal features from image sequences followed by classification. Some of the prominent works in this direction include, but are not limited to, Chinese finger sign language recognition with gray-level co-occurrence matrix features and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifier by Jiang et al [ 13 ], HGR model with infrared information captured with the leap motion controller and machine learning techniques like KNN, support vector machine (SVM) and decision trees by Nogales and Benalcazar [ 14 ], Grassmann manifold-based discriminant analysis model with the finger tip-based hand trajectory features extracted through either the depth or skeleton information [ 15 ], neural network (NN) model with the feature vectors extracted through video summarization technique for Peruvian sign language recognition [ 16 ], support vector machine (SVM) classification of the shape and trajectory features extracted via 3-D hand skeleton data [ 17 ], SVM model with combined shape and trajectory information by Bai et al [ 18 ], NN model with the textural feature descriptors presented by Agab and Chelali [ 19 ], local binary pattern features with hidden markov model (HMM) for Arabic sign language recognition (ArSLR) by Ahmed et al [ 20 ], artificial neural network (ANN) model with the discrete cosine transform (DCT) features extracted from the selfie video sequences of ISL gestures by Rao et al [ 21 ], and the multiclass SVM model trained with hand shape and trajectory features for ISL words by Athira et al [ 22 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies extract specific features and then use machine learning algorithms to classify the SL images. Many different SL have been used in these studies, namely American SL [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] , Arabic SL [9][10][11][12] , British SL 13 , Chinese SL 14 , German SL 15,16 , Indian SL 17 , Irish SL 18 , Pakistani SL [19][20][21][22][23][24] , Persian SL 25 , and more in combination such as American & German SL 26 , American & Thai SL 27 and American & Indian SL 28 .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%