2019
DOI: 10.1109/msp.2019.2930427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Signal Processing Perspective of Monitoring Active Volcanoes [Applications Corner]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…U.VSR schemes hardly surpass 70%. Nevertheless, due to the cost required to design supervised systems and their drop of effectiveness when the feature patterns of the events highly vary reflecting changes in the eruptive cycle, the current trend (Khan et al, 2019;Langer et al, 2019) is to use simpler U.VSR. Despite their low classification scores, U.VSR properly responds to the inherent variability of the seismic activity (Peltier et al, 2018).…”
Section: Volcano-independent Seismic Recognition (Vivsr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…U.VSR schemes hardly surpass 70%. Nevertheless, due to the cost required to design supervised systems and their drop of effectiveness when the feature patterns of the events highly vary reflecting changes in the eruptive cycle, the current trend (Khan et al, 2019;Langer et al, 2019) is to use simpler U.VSR. Despite their low classification scores, U.VSR properly responds to the inherent variability of the seismic activity (Peltier et al, 2018).…”
Section: Volcano-independent Seismic Recognition (Vivsr)mentioning
confidence: 99%