2017
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2017.2732730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sierpinski Space-Filling Clock Tree Using Multiply-by-3 Fractal-Coupled Ring Oscillators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At frequency offsets far from the carrier or equivalently over small timescales, the improvement in frequency stability is less than ∝ 1/ √ p. This is due to the finite time associated with correction of noise perturbations in a weakly coupled system [13]. However, the possibility of achieving multiple clock phases with resolutions independent of the smallest gate delay for a given technology [11] and ease of low-skew lowjitter timing distribution [14] make their use viable for a variety of applications [15]- [18]. This article presents collective pulse oscillators (CPOs) that are realized using pulse regenerative amplifiers [19] as the main delay element.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At frequency offsets far from the carrier or equivalently over small timescales, the improvement in frequency stability is less than ∝ 1/ √ p. This is due to the finite time associated with correction of noise perturbations in a weakly coupled system [13]. However, the possibility of achieving multiple clock phases with resolutions independent of the smallest gate delay for a given technology [11] and ease of low-skew lowjitter timing distribution [14] make their use viable for a variety of applications [15]- [18]. This article presents collective pulse oscillators (CPOs) that are realized using pulse regenerative amplifiers [19] as the main delay element.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%