2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66095-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Short-Term, Multicenter, Randomized Double-Blind Dose Titration Study of the Efficacy and Anticholinergic Side Effects of Transdermal Compared to Immediate Release Oral Oxybutynin Treatment of Patients With Urge Urinary Incontinence

Abstract: Transdermal delivery of oxybutynin resulted in comparable efficacy and a significantly improved anticholinergic side effect profile compared with oral administration in adults with urge urinary incontinence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Three articles [19][20][21] not specifying adverse events, one article [22] not differentiating adverse events between antimuscarinic and placebo, six articles [23][24][25][26][27][28] not discriminating adverse events between different fixed dosages, and three articles [29][30][31] only comparing different releases within the same antimuscarinic and dosage were excluded. Thus, we finally included 69 trials including one report [66] with two different age strata ( Table 2, Data S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three articles [19][20][21] not specifying adverse events, one article [22] not differentiating adverse events between antimuscarinic and placebo, six articles [23][24][25][26][27][28] not discriminating adverse events between different fixed dosages, and three articles [29][30][31] only comparing different releases within the same antimuscarinic and dosage were excluded. Thus, we finally included 69 trials including one report [66] with two different age strata ( Table 2, Data S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dry mouth is a particularly bothersome side effect for patients that can limit therapy with oxybutynin IR. This side affect is less frequent with the ER and transdermal preparations (Anderson et al, 1999;Davila et al, 2001;Versi et al, 2000) Irritation and pruritus at the application site has been reported in approximately 15 percent of patients using transdermal oxybutynin and 5 percent using the topical gel. (Dmochowski et al, 2002) …”
Section: Oxybutyninmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 A short-term comparative study suggested that OXY-TDS had efficacy similar to that of immediate-release oral oxybutynin but was associated with a significantly lower incidence of dry mouth than the oral formulation. 18 A study in healthy volunteers further showed that the ratio of N-desethyloxybutynin (N-DEO) to oxybutynin plasma exposure levels was approximately 1.3 for OXY-TDS and approximately 4.0 for orally administered extended-release oxybutynin. 19 Subsequently, it was shown that healthy subjects receiving oxybutynin via transdermal delivery had significantly greater saliva production than those who received an oral formulation.…”
Section: Formulation Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%