1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0936-6555(97)80053-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A short fractionation radiotherapy treatment for poor prognosis patients with high grade glioma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
25
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 patients completed treatment as planned and the MS for the whole group was 16 weeks, with 7 patients surviving for more than 6 months. A matched case-control comparison with data from patients in previous MRC studies showed that these results were similar to conventional fractionation for this group of patients [22].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 patients completed treatment as planned and the MS for the whole group was 16 weeks, with 7 patients surviving for more than 6 months. A matched case-control comparison with data from patients in previous MRC studies showed that these results were similar to conventional fractionation for this group of patients [22].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Ford et al [22] reported on a small UK prospective series of 32 patients with high-grade glioma and poor prognostic features [Medical Research Council (MRC) prognostic score .25] treated at the Addenbrookes Hospital Cambridge, UK, with a dose of 36 Gy in 12 fractions to the tumour and surrounding oedema with a 2 cm margin. 28 patients completed treatment as planned and the MS for the whole group was 16 weeks, with 7 patients surviving for more than 6 months.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39][40][41][42][43][44][45] Recent randomized studies have documented improved survival with RT versus supportive care, and no difference in survival with a 3-week course of RT versus a 6-week course. 39,46 A larger randomized study (Nordic trial) has also shown the clear absence of any detrimental effect of short-course RT versus 6 weeks in patients age 60 or older.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40][41][42][43][44][45] Eventually, Roa and colleagues in Canada performed a randomized study of short course RT (40 Gy in 15 fractions in 3 weeks) versus standard RT (60 Gy in 30 fractions in 6 weeks) in 100 patients aged 60 or older and a KPS of 50 or higher. 46 Median survivals were 5.6 months for the 3-week course of RT and 5.1 months for the 6-week course of RT (p = 0.63).…”
Section: Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst these only one trial, by Maarten [45] et al, prospectively compared hypofractionated radiation with conventional fractionation and no significant differences were found between the two in terms of palliative effect as well as survival. Two other trials [42,46] compared hypofractionated RT with matched historical controls from previous MRC cohorts treated with conventional fractionation (60 Gy/30 fractions). Although the median survival of patients treated with hypofractionated RT was lesser (by 2.5 Á/4.5 months) than matched controls, the improvement in QOL was reasonably comparable.…”
Section: Trials Using Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Alonementioning
confidence: 99%