Motivic Integration and Its Interactions With Model Theory and Non-Archimedean Geometry 2011
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511667534.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A short course on geometric motivic integration

Abstract: ABSTRACT. These notes grew out of the authors effort to understand the theory of motivic integration. They give a short but thorough introduction to the flavor of motivic integration which nowadays goes by the name of geometric motivic integration. Motivic inegration was introduced by Kontsevich and the foundations were worked out by Denef, Loeser, Batyrev and Looijenga. We focus on the smooth complex case and present the theory as self contained as possible. As an illustration we give some applications to bir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The following propositions are versions of standard facts about jet spaces, and can be proved in the same way (for example, see [Bli05]). …”
Section: Prolongationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The following propositions are versions of standard facts about jet spaces, and can be proved in the same way (for example, see [Bli05]). …”
Section: Prolongationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We proved in [24] the following result: 24]). Let f := x a 1 1 + x a 2 2 + · · · + x a k 2 + · · · + x an n , a k > 1, and we suppose that the polynomials g i , i ≥ 1, belong to the integral closure of the ideal generated by x a 1 1 , x a 2 2 , · · · , x an n . Then the morphism p m : (W(S) m ) red → S := Spec K[[s]] is flat for all 0 ≤ m ≤ ∞.…”
Section: Deformation Of Spaces Of M-jetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the year 1995, Kontsevich, using these spaces, introduced the motivic integration to resolve the Batyrev conjecture on the Calabi-Yau varieties (see [21]). For more references on motivic integration see [1], [5], [6] and [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We define the class [k * ] of the group of units k * of k as the class [G m ] ∈ K 0 (ν k ). Since G m ∼ = Spec k x, 1 x , we get [G m ] = Spec k x, 1…”
Section: (32)mentioning
confidence: 99%