2014
DOI: 10.1080/17405904.2014.962068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Shifting Collective Identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, CCAAC staff interviews indicate that the organization reluctantly adopted the "social investment" message and set aside messaging that focused on childcare as a women's equity issue, likely because childcare advocates are not completely at odds with a perspective that focuses on child poverty, early learning and intervention. Our earlier studies Richardson and Langford 2014) using content and critical discourse analysis also demonstrate that a women's equity discourse was muted in CCAAC public messaging in 2005 and 2008.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, CCAAC staff interviews indicate that the organization reluctantly adopted the "social investment" message and set aside messaging that focused on childcare as a women's equity issue, likely because childcare advocates are not completely at odds with a perspective that focuses on child poverty, early learning and intervention. Our earlier studies Richardson and Langford 2014) using content and critical discourse analysis also demonstrate that a women's equity discourse was muted in CCAAC public messaging in 2005 and 2008.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…2 Along with content and critical discourse analysis of public advocacy messaging Richardson and Langford 2014), 34 semi-structured interviews were conducted with key players in provincial and national childcare SMOs about their advocacy experiences during high and low times of childcare policy action. Interview question topics included: (1) an informant's involvement inside or outside of a childcare SMO; (2) perceptions of a SMO's approach to activism and/or advocacy (political opportunities, organizational goals and strategies, initiatives, internal dynamics, resources such as leadership structure, gender composition, funding, key political and organizational allies, main struggles/barriers to success, future plans); (3) the extent, effects and consequences of professionalization of the ECEC sector on childcare SMOs; (4) and views on Canadian childcare SMOs' successes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provincial legislation dictates that RECEs run before-and-after-school programs when a child care center is the deliverer of these services (Child Care and Early Years Act, 2014). With the high demand for child care in general (Richardson and Langford, 2015)-and specifically, before-and-afterschool care-thousands of RECEs across the province are working at two high-peak times: early morning and late afternoon. Hence, these RECEs are actively working a split shift.…”
Section: Chapter 1 Introduction Background Information and Statement Of The Research Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a considerable amount of research indicates that quality early childhood programs led by well-trained RECEs are vital to children's development (Richardson and Langford, 2015), its commensurate value to a child's overall education is not yet acknowledged.…”
Section: Chapter 1 Introduction Background Information and Statement Of The Research Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, Kodeih and Greenwood (2014) argue that identity aspirations may be more important than past core characteristics. Also, organizational identity may differ across different hierarchical levels (Ezzamel et al, 2001) and change over time in style, modality and social actor representation (Richardson and Langford, 2015). Representing a middle ground, Golant et al (2015) demonstrate that organizational identity is constructed through the dynamic use of both core values of the past and present-day identity aspirations.…”
Section: Organizational Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%