2002
DOI: 10.1006/jnth.2001.2720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sharp Upper Estimate of the Number of Integral Points in a 5-Dimensional Tetrahedra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Yau geometric conjecture was answered affirmatively for n = 3, 4, 5 by [3,22,37], respectively. In order to overcome the difficulty that the GLY sharp estimate conjecture is only true if a n is larger than y(n), a positive integer depending on n, Yau proposes to prove a new sharp polynomial estimate conjecture which is motivated from the Yau geometric conjecture.…”
Section: Conjecture 12 (Yau Geometric Conjecture)mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Yau geometric conjecture was answered affirmatively for n = 3, 4, 5 by [3,22,37], respectively. In order to overcome the difficulty that the GLY sharp estimate conjecture is only true if a n is larger than y(n), a positive integer depending on n, Yau proposes to prove a new sharp polynomial estimate conjecture which is motivated from the Yau geometric conjecture.…”
Section: Conjecture 12 (Yau Geometric Conjecture)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In private communication to the second author, Granville formulated this sharp estimated conjecture independently after reading [21]. Again, the sharp GLY conjecture has been proven individually for n = 3, 4, 5 by [22,37,38], respectively. It has also been proven generally for n 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Starting from early 90's, Yau, Xu and Lin [22,37,39] tried to get a sharp upper estimates of P n when a i are just positive real numbers. They were able to obtain it under certain conditions, specifically when n = 3, 4, and 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%