2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2006.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sharp form of Moser–Trudinger inequality in high dimension

Abstract: Let Ω be a bounded smooth domain in R n (n 3). This paper deals with a sharp form of MoserTrudinger inequality. Let λ 1 (Ω) = inf u∈H 1,n 0 (Ω), u ≡0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We should mention that one bubble analysis for solutions to N -Laplace equations has been considered by Li [9] and the second author [19,20]. Similar results has been obtained by Martinazzi [10] for powers of the Laplacian.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…We should mention that one bubble analysis for solutions to N -Laplace equations has been considered by Li [9] and the second author [19,20]. Similar results has been obtained by Martinazzi [10] for powers of the Laplacian.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…whereas for any α ≥ λ 1 (Ω), the above supremum is infinity. The analogs of (2) were obtained on a compact Riemannian surface [23] and on a high dimeniosnal Euclidean domain [24]. Clearly, the inequality (2) is stronger than the inequality (1).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In other words, there exists u α ∈ H ∩ C 1 (Ω) such that J α λn (u α ) = sup u∈H J α λn (u). When F (x) = |x|, Adimurthi and Druet [1], Y.Y Yang [38] have proved the above theorem. But the F (x) = |x|, it is more different, need much more delicate work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…where G and ψ are functions given in (38), R = − log ǫ, η ∈ C 1 0 (W 2Rǫ (x 0 )) satisfying that η = 1 on W Rǫ (x 0 ) and |∇η| ≤ 2 Rǫ , b and C are constants depending only on ǫ to be determined later. Clearly W 2Rǫ (x 0 ) ⊂ Ω provided that ǫ is sufficiently small.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 12mentioning
confidence: 99%