The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1080/08912963.2019.1681421
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A shark fauna from the Campanian of Hornby Island, British Columbia, Canada: an insight into the diversity of Cretaceous deep-water assemblages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the extant Galeorhinus galeus and the odontaspidid genus Odontaspis occur from the surface to the outer shelves and down the slopes to possibly 1600 m, whereas Carcharias (the only other living representative of the para‐ or polyphyletic family Odontaspididae) is observed from 0 to 131 m depth, but mostly occurs between 15 and 25 m (Compagno 1984a , 1984b , 2003 ; Cappetta et al . 2019 ; Froese & Pauly 2019 ). However, extrapolating the palaeoecology of G. cuvieri and B. lerichei from only three extant sharks might represent a limitation because some triakids and odontaspidids in the past may have had different habitat preferences (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the extant Galeorhinus galeus and the odontaspidid genus Odontaspis occur from the surface to the outer shelves and down the slopes to possibly 1600 m, whereas Carcharias (the only other living representative of the para‐ or polyphyletic family Odontaspididae) is observed from 0 to 131 m depth, but mostly occurs between 15 and 25 m (Compagno 1984a , 1984b , 2003 ; Cappetta et al . 2019 ; Froese & Pauly 2019 ). However, extrapolating the palaeoecology of G. cuvieri and B. lerichei from only three extant sharks might represent a limitation because some triakids and odontaspidids in the past may have had different habitat preferences (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of a fourth genus, Proteothrinax (Pfeil, 1983) is questionable due to the inadequate type material (Richter & Ward 1990; Cappetta et al . 2021). Teeth of the recently described genus Dykeius possess very slender and needle‐like cusps and are extraordinarily large, which excludes this genus for further comparison with the specimens reported here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, all fossil material assigned to Propristiophorus was synonymized with Pristiophorus . Other Cretaceous pristiophorid remains have been found in Antarctica, Canada, Japan and Madagascar (Cappetta, Morrison, & Adnet, 2019; Cione et al., 2018; Gottfried & Rabarison, 1997; Nishimoto & Morozumi, 1979; Otero et al., 2014), while those reported for Australia (Kemp, 1991) apparently belong to teleost fish (Adnet & Cappetta, 2001). Remains of the extant genus Pliotrema are rarer, with only two finds reported thus far (Case, 1973; Welton, 1974), but indicate that the genus has existed since at least the Palaeocene (~66–56 Ma).…”
Section: Evolutionary History and Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The locations of fossil pristiophorid remains suggest that sawsharks had a much broader distribution in the past compared to the distributions shown by extant species, with regions such as Antarctica, Europe, New Zealand, western North America and South America once being inhabited by sawsharks (e.g. Cappetta et al., 2019; Engelbrecht et al., 2017; Keyes, 1982; Villafaña, Nielsen, Klug, & Kriwet, 2019; Welton, 1974). Keyes (1982) hypothesizes that the ancestor of all pristiophorids may have originated in Asia, particularly the ancestor of the genus Pristiophorus .…”
Section: Evolutionary History and Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%