2021
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2021.3051607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sharding Scheme-Based Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm for Enhancing Security in Blockchain-Enabled Industrial Internet of Things

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to highlight the advantages of the proposed algorithm, we compare DPPMOA with other algorithms in DTLZ (1-7) and WFG (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9), and analyze their SP, IGD, and coverage. The results are shown in Tables 3-5.…”
Section: Results On the Dtlz And Wfg Benchmark Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to highlight the advantages of the proposed algorithm, we compare DPPMOA with other algorithms in DTLZ (1-7) and WFG (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9), and analyze their SP, IGD, and coverage. The results are shown in Tables 3-5.…”
Section: Results On the Dtlz And Wfg Benchmark Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability and high requirements for real-time communications are very important in IIoT. The authors of [30] proposed a many-objective optimization algorithm based on the dynamic reward and penalty mechanism (MaOEA-DRP). It optimizes the shared validation validity model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an indicator for evaluating the entire system, the coverage is calculated directly after recommendation for all users in the system. Table 2 shows the comparison effect of the NSGA-III [24], RVEA [25], MaOEA-SIN [38], NSGAIII-GBFE [34], and MaPSOMC-RS on the F-measure, diversity, novelty, and coverage of the recommendation model. At the same time, since each algorithm will produce a set of solutions (providing users with multiple recommendation lists), each recommendation list has different performance in the 4 evaluation indicators.…”
Section: A Experimental Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%