2000
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/16/5/303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A shape reconstruction method for electromagnetic tomography using adjoint fields and level sets

Abstract: A t wo-step shape reconstruction method for electromagnetic (EM) tomography is presented which uses adjoint elds and level sets. The inhomogeneous background permittivity distribution and the values of the permittivities in some penetrable obstacles are assumed to be known, and the number, sizes, shapes, and locations of these obstacles have to be reconstructed given noisy limited-view EM data. The main application we address in the paper is the imaging and monitoring of pollutant plumes in environmental clean… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
216
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
216
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Santosa [13] lays out this basic strategy and demonstrates the idea on some small problems such as de-blurring 2D, binary images. Dorn et al [16], [17] use this strategy to solve for permittivity using a sequence of electromagnetic measurements, and show examples for simulated data in a 2D domain. This paper makes several important contributions; first we describe a specific formulation of the direct surface estimation problem for tomographic data, second we present a level-set implementation of this formulation that is practical on large data sets, and third we demonstrate, using real data sets, the effectiveness of direct surface estimation for a specific class of tomographic problems that are subject to noise, limited-angle sinograms, and misregistration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Santosa [13] lays out this basic strategy and demonstrates the idea on some small problems such as de-blurring 2D, binary images. Dorn et al [16], [17] use this strategy to solve for permittivity using a sequence of electromagnetic measurements, and show examples for simulated data in a 2D domain. This paper makes several important contributions; first we describe a specific formulation of the direct surface estimation problem for tomographic data, second we present a level-set implementation of this formulation that is practical on large data sets, and third we demonstrate, using real data sets, the effectiveness of direct surface estimation for a specific class of tomographic problems that are subject to noise, limited-angle sinograms, and misregistration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first class of approaches are based on the solution of a nonlinear inverse scattering problem via an iterative minimization scheme [32,33]. However, due to the nonlinearity of the inverse problem, the solution scheme may suffer of the presence of local minima ('false' solutions) affecting the overall reliability of the reconstruction procedure, and suitable regularization strategies have to be adopted to assure the consistency of the results [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level set approach has become popular because of its ability to track propagating interfaces [8,9], and more recently it has been applied in variety of applications in inverse problems and in image processing [10,11,12,13]. Level set based reconstruction method (LSRM) is a nonlinear inversion scheme using an optimization approach to iteratively reduce a given cost functional, which is the norm of the difference between the simulated and measured data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level set method for shape based reconstruction is well studied in electrical and electromagnetic imaging for simulated data [10,11,12,15,16,17,18,19]; however, it has been seldom shown to be used for human data. This study is the first implementation of LSRM for EIT breathing real data demonstrating the results of applying a difference solver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation