Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualisation (CGIV 2007) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/cgiv.2007.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Shape Preserving Verification Technique for Parametric Curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our paper aims at giving the positive answer to this question. There exists several well established methods: spline functions [13], shape-preserving techniques [14], subdivision algorithms [15], Bezier curves, B-splines, NURBS [16] and others [12] to overcome difficulties of polynomial interpolation, but matrix interpolation MHR (based on simple matrix calculations with low computational costs) seems to be quite novel in the area of shape reconstruction. In comparison MHR method with Bézier curves, Hermite curves and B-curves (B-splines) or NURBS one unpleasant feature of these curves must be mentioned: small change of one characteristic point can make big change of whole reconstructed curve [17].…”
Section: Shape Reconstruction Via Mhr Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our paper aims at giving the positive answer to this question. There exists several well established methods: spline functions [13], shape-preserving techniques [14], subdivision algorithms [15], Bezier curves, B-splines, NURBS [16] and others [12] to overcome difficulties of polynomial interpolation, but matrix interpolation MHR (based on simple matrix calculations with low computational costs) seems to be quite novel in the area of shape reconstruction. In comparison MHR method with Bézier curves, Hermite curves and B-curves (B-splines) or NURBS one unpleasant feature of these curves must be mentioned: small change of one characteristic point can make big change of whole reconstructed curve [17].…”
Section: Shape Reconstruction Via Mhr Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relation between two surfaces is determined by convex hull property and cuboidal smallest convection hull property in both the cases intersection of segment of line done by approximation final patch by first order cubic Bézier patch and planer triangle and then intersection done using recursive subdivision and incremental tracing. [18] expressed Cubic Bézier curve parametric forms shape preservation is difficu lt and various parameters effects like position and order of curve, types of curve, weight of curve and duplicat ion of control points. A technique is derived based on these to preserve shape of CBC by normalizing total positivity and corner cutting algorithm.…”
Section: Additional Associated Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods have many weak sides [21] and are not sufficient for curve interpolation in the situations when the curve cannot be built by polynomials or trigonometric functions. Also, there exist several well-established methods of curve modeling, for example shape-preserving techniques [22], subdivision algorithms [23] and others [24] to overcome the difficulties of polynomial interpolation, but probabilistic interpolation with nodes combination seems to be quite novel in the area of shape modeling. The proposed 2D curve interpolation is the functional modeling via any elementary functions and it helps us to fit the curve during the computations.…”
Section: Shape Representation and Curve Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%