2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.aml.2011.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A shape optimization formulation of weld pool determination

Abstract: International audienceIn this paper, we propose a shape optimization formulation for a problem modeling a process of welding. We show the existence of an optimal solution. The finite element method is used for the discretization of the problem. The discrete problem is solved by an identification technique using a parameterization of the weld pool by Bézier curves and Genetic algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…El Yazidi and Ellabib 18 used the genetic algorithm (GA) with the finite element to estimate the configuration of depletion layer in semiconductor. Chakib et al 19 used the GA to solve a shape optimization problem in weld pool. El Yazidi and Ellabib 20 used an augmented Lagrangian approach to solve a bilateral free boundary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El Yazidi and Ellabib 18 used the genetic algorithm (GA) with the finite element to estimate the configuration of depletion layer in semiconductor. Chakib et al 19 used the GA to solve a shape optimization problem in weld pool. El Yazidi and Ellabib 20 used an augmented Lagrangian approach to solve a bilateral free boundary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instability of the problem. To prove the instability result of the inverse problem (3), we adopt the method already used in [8,13,15,14]. Thus, a local regularity argument is used to show the compactness of the Riesz operator corresponding to the shape Hessian at a solution ω * ∈ Ω d0 of the inverse problem.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the regularity H 2 (Ω d0 ) is due to a local regularity argument (as the one used in [8,13,15,14]), since the object ω * has a C 2 boundary and since the condition on ∂ω * is homogeneous (and then smooth), the solution of problem ( 28) is globally H 1 (Ω), but locally H 2 (Ω d0 ).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For details concerning the differentiation with respect to the domain( see [30,28,29] and the book [23]). We can also use the techniques developed in [13,14,15] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%