2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73273-0_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Shape-Guided Deformable Model with Evolutionary Algorithm Initialization for 3D Soft Tissue Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rousson et al developed a method to incorporate both shape and appearance model using bayesian formulation [4]. The deformable shape model with shape prior information was employed in [5] and [6] for prostate and bladder segmentation. Recently, graph-based methods with a global optimality guarantee have attracted a lot of attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rousson et al developed a method to incorporate both shape and appearance model using bayesian formulation [4]. The deformable shape model with shape prior information was employed in [5] and [6] for prostate and bladder segmentation. Recently, graph-based methods with a global optimality guarantee have attracted a lot of attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the cardinality of the training set is proportional to the degree of natural variability of the organ shape. For example, Heimann et al selected 32 subjects out of 86 to train their 3D reference model of 2562 equally distributed landmarks, used for segmentation of the liver in CT volumes [23]. Unfortunately, such a large dataset is currently not available for tongue MRI volumes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem becomes more critical in medical image analysis due to inadequate training samples and varied pathologies. There have been strategies to relieve the over constraint, including loosening up the shape constraints [2,3], introducing additional flexibility [4], synthesising additional training samples [5], and more recently, modifying shape prior using manifold learning [6] or sparse composition [7]. In these methods there is no obvious a priori optimal parameters and it is time consuming to tune the parameters to specific applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%