2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A shadow fraction method for mapping biomass of northern boreal black spruce forests using QuickBird imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
50
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, if biomass does not correlate with forest canopy structure, its relationship with texture measures is stronger than with spectral parameters. This was also noted by Fuchs et al [10] for Siberian tundra forest, by Leboeuf et al [44] for boreal black spruce stands, and by Lu et al [32] for mature moist forest and liana forest stands in the Brazilian Amazon basin. Consequently, in the case of Malagasy lowland rainforest, the relationship between biomass and forest canopy structure is stronger for degraded forest stands than for non-degraded forest stands.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Conversely, if biomass does not correlate with forest canopy structure, its relationship with texture measures is stronger than with spectral parameters. This was also noted by Fuchs et al [10] for Siberian tundra forest, by Leboeuf et al [44] for boreal black spruce stands, and by Lu et al [32] for mature moist forest and liana forest stands in the Brazilian Amazon basin. Consequently, in the case of Malagasy lowland rainforest, the relationship between biomass and forest canopy structure is stronger for degraded forest stands than for non-degraded forest stands.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…We defined this value as TSF WV . The impact of variation in sun angle on TSF WV was assumed to be minimal because the WorldView-1 images were all acquired on the same day at local noon and since Leboeuf et al (2007) showed that normalising TSF based on sun and sensor geometry had a non-discernible impact on the relationship between TSF and field biomass measurements. Variation in snow depth was also assumed to have a negligible effect on TSF WV due to the minimal topographic relief in the area.…”
Section: Aboveground Biomass Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very high resolution satellite and aerial images with pixel size as small as 1.0 m are increasingly utilized for forest parameter estimation. In many studies using such data, however, information is aggregated to the smaller scale, and as with lower resolution sensors, the reliance is on the relative proportion of shade cast by the trees [7,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%