A Severe Sepsis Mortality Prediction Model and Score for Use With Administrative Data

Abstract

Objective Administrative data is used for research, quality improvement, and health policy in severe sepsis. However, there is not a sepsis-specific tool applicable to administrative data with which to adjust for illness severity. Our objective was to develop, internally validate, and externally validate a severe sepsis mortality prediction model and associated mortality prediction score. Design Retrospective cohort study using 2012 administrative data from five US states. Three cohorts of patients with severe sepsis were created: 1) ICD-9-CM codes for severe sepsis/septic shock, 2) ‘Martin’ approach, and 3) ‘Angus’ approach. The model was developed and internally validated in ICD-9-CM cohort and externally validated in other cohorts. Integer point values for each predictor variable were generated to create a sepsis severity score. Setting Acute care, non-federal hospitals in NY, MD, FL, MI, and WA Subjects Patients in one of three severe sepsis cohorts: 1) explicitly coded (n=108,448), 2) Martin cohort (n=139,094), and 3) Angus cohort (n=523,637) Interventions None Measurements and Main Results Maximum likelihood estimation logistic regression to develop a predictive model for in-hospital mortality. Model calibration and discrimination assessed via Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit (GOF) and C-statistics respectively. Primary cohort subset into risk deciles and observed versus predicted mortality plotted. GOF demonstrated p>0.05 for each cohort demonstrating sound calibration. C-statistic ranged from low of 0.709 (sepsis severity score) to high of 0.838 (Angus cohort) suggesting good to excellent model discrimination. Comparison of observed versus expected mortality was robust although accuracy decreased in highest risk decile. Conclusions Our sepsis severity model and score is a tool that provides reliable risk adjustment for administrative data.

CKD and Risk for Hospitalization With Infection: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

“…Infection prevention programs (e.g., vaccination and preventive procedures for healthcare-acquired infections) usually feature patients on dialysis and individuals with severely decreased kidney function (eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ). 29–32 Currently, albuminuria is not taken into account in this context. Thus, our results suggest that these programs could be expanded to include persons with less severely decreased kidney function, including those with elevated albuminuria.…”

Association of Household Income Level and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Sepsis: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Analysis

“…Furthermore, the use of the sepsis severity score developed by Ford et al allowed for adjustment of the severity of sepsis in our modeling, a key component lacking from previous studies. 23 …”

Where You Live Matters

“…Residual confounding may exist in the regression model even after risk adjustment with the sepsis mortality prediction tool. Although this tool offers excellent discrimination and validity, 13 it is limited by the absence of clinical data. This limitation likely explains the observation that care in rural hospitals was associated with reduced odds of mortality despite evidence that small-volume hospitals are associated with higher severe sepsis mortality rates.…”

“…A previously validated severe sepsis mortality prediction tool was used to risk adjust each member of the cohort. 13 Briefly, this tool combines patient demographics with ICD-9-CM codes for both comorbidities and acute complications of sepsis. The tool generates a probability of mortality for risk adjustment with administrative data and has demonstrated excellent discrimination and external validity.…”