2007
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2007.26586092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations

Abstract: I argue that research on organizational configurations has been limited by a mismatch between theory and methods and introduce set-theoretic methods as a viable alternative for overcoming this mismatch. I demonstrate the value of such methods for studying organizational configurations and discuss their applicability for examining equifinality and limited diversity among configurations, as well as their relevance to other research fields such as complementarities theory, complexity theory, and the resource-base… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
1,530
2
50

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,643 publications
(1,718 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
24
1,530
2
50
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, those in dynamic environments would choose to deploy fact-based SCM initiatives along with the investment for accurate data. This further demands the use of contingency (or configuration) theory (El Sawy et al 2010;Fiss 2007) in studying the value of business analytics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, those in dynamic environments would choose to deploy fact-based SCM initiatives along with the investment for accurate data. This further demands the use of contingency (or configuration) theory (El Sawy et al 2010;Fiss 2007) in studying the value of business analytics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain fields, such as organizational change management, HRM or the resource-based view (RBV) employ the configurational comparative method to complete insufficient statistical analyses from prior studies (Fiss, 2007;Grandori and Furnari, 2008;Pajunen, 2008;Schneider, Schulze-Bentrop, and Paunescu, 2009;Greckhamer, 2011;Hsu, Woodside, and Marshall, 2013;Woodside, 2013). A configurational comparative method assumes complex causality-a condition or combination of minimum necessary and/or sufficient conditions for a particular outcome-and nonlinear relationships where, "variables found to be causally related in one configuration may be unrelated or even inversely related in another" (Meyer et al, 1993(Meyer et al, : 1178.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative Analysis (QCA) developed by Charles Ragin have been shown to be powerful to evaluate the predictive power of configurations on specific organizational or institutional outcomes [196,197]. They could be used to operationalize our typology and evaluate the impact of specific configurations on organizations' sustainable performance.…”
Section: Operationalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%