2006
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A set of nearest neighbor parameters for predicting the enthalpy change of RNA secondary structure formation

Abstract: A complete set of nearest neighbor parameters to predict the enthalpy change of RNA secondary structure formation was derived. These parameters can be used with available free energy nearest neighbor parameters to extend the secondary structure prediction of RNA sequences to temperatures other than 37°C. The parameters were tested by predicting the secondary structures of sequences with known secondary structure that are from organisms with known optimal growth temperatures. Compared with the previous set of e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
210
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
6
210
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the enthalpy contribution for group I single-nucleotide bulge loops is just the average of the measured values (13.4 6 9.4 kcal/mol). As noted previously, the standard error for enthalpy measurements is much larger than for free energy measurements (Lu et al 2006). The enthalpy for the group II bulges is slightly larger than the enthalpy for group I bulges (14.1 6 9.2 kcal/mol) (Blose et al 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the enthalpy contribution for group I single-nucleotide bulge loops is just the average of the measured values (13.4 6 9.4 kcal/mol). As noted previously, the standard error for enthalpy measurements is much larger than for free energy measurements (Lu et al 2006). The enthalpy for the group II bulges is slightly larger than the enthalpy for group I bulges (14.1 6 9.2 kcal/mol) (Blose et al 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The enthalpy for the group II bulges is slightly larger than the enthalpy for group I bulges (14.1 6 9.2 kcal/mol) (Blose et al 2007). The enthalpy values presented in Table 3 can be used in conjunction with the free energy and enthalpy parameters for other nearest-neighbor motifs to determine the stability of RNA structures at temperatures other than 37°C (Lu et al 2006); however, the range of enthalpic values makes this extrapolation problematic.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This does not have to be the case, however. Base-pairing is typically much weaker in mesophilic than thermophilic functional RNAs (Galtier and Lobry 1997;Lu et al 2006), and strong tertiary interactions can hold together intrinsically unstable helices (Stein and Crothers 1976a;Blose et al 2007). Thus, it is possible that secondary and tertiary structure could melt simultaneously leading to partial or full unfolding cooperativity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enthalpic contributions due to a group III bulge loops are not statistically different than the value obtained for group I or group II bulge loops (16.5 kcal/mol), so all of the enthalpic values for group I, II, and III bulge loops can be combined for an average value of 16.0 kcal/mol. The enthalpic values can be used in conjunction with the free energy parameters to determine the stability of RNA structures at temperatures other than 37°C (Lu et al 2006). …”
Section: Enthalpic Contributions Of Group III Single Nucleotide Bulgementioning
confidence: 99%