A Service-Oriented Blueprint for COTS Integration: the Hidden Part of the Iceberg

Ermagan, Vina; Farcas, Claudiu; Farcas, Emilia; Krüger, Ingolf H.; Menarini, Massimiliano

doi:10.1109/iwicss.2007.2

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We used the blueprint architecture to also ease the integration of COTS components by lifting the integration concern at the service specification level and by treating it as a first-class citizen in the development process [10]. We explicitly modeled the interaction between the roles defined in the services and the COTS components supplying the functionality.…”

Section: Discussion and Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Treasure Map for Rich Services

Demchak

Farcas

et al. 2007

2007 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Large systems-of-systems often service large numbers of stakeholders -more stakeholders often means more concerns, many of which are crosscutting. The Rich Services architecture is a type of Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) that allows hierarchical decomposition of a system architecture into separate concerns, thereby capturing different system aspects and their interactions, and accounting for crosscutting concerns concisely and sensibly. By leveraging emerging Enterprise Service Bus technology, Rich Services enable a simple and direct deployment mapping to a system-of-systems network.This paper describes a development process that leverages Rich Services and is compatible with agile development methodologies. It encompasses use cases, requirements decomposition, role identification, and service definition to produce a Rich Services logical architecture that can then be mapped to a virtual network topology, and finally a physical network topology. The process decouples development stages to improve flexibility and productivity of complex projects, promising reduced cost and risk.

show abstract

Section: Discussion and Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%