2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0an01220c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A SERS-based competitive immunoassay for highly sensitive and specific detection of ochratoxin A

Abstract: Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a well-known carcinogenic contaminant in food commodities. Highly sensitive and specific detection of OTA level is an essential way to prevent health risk of human/animal. In...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intensities of 1456 cm −1 peak compared with the acrylamide concentrations were curve fitted and the best fitting (R 2 = 0.995) was found to be the second order polynomial fit (Figure 9) with the equation y = 3.01 + 20.02x – 1.98x 2 . For calculating the limit of detection (LOD), the standard IUPAC method was used with Equation () 49–52 italicLODgoodbreak=ytrue¯bgoodbreak+tαn1goodbreak×sbn11+1n0.25em where ytrue¯b is the average blank signal value, tαn1 is the critical t value of one‐sided t‐distribution test (with a confidence level of 95%), sbn1 is the standard deviation with n1 degrees of freedom, and n is the number of replications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The intensities of 1456 cm −1 peak compared with the acrylamide concentrations were curve fitted and the best fitting (R 2 = 0.995) was found to be the second order polynomial fit (Figure 9) with the equation y = 3.01 + 20.02x – 1.98x 2 . For calculating the limit of detection (LOD), the standard IUPAC method was used with Equation () 49–52 italicLODgoodbreak=ytrue¯bgoodbreak+tαn1goodbreak×sbn11+1n0.25em where ytrue¯b is the average blank signal value, tαn1 is the critical t value of one‐sided t‐distribution test (with a confidence level of 95%), sbn1 is the standard deviation with n1 degrees of freedom, and n is the number of replications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For calculating the limit of detection (LOD), the standard IUPAC method was used with Equation (2). [49][50][51][52] F I G U R E 7 Raman measurement of 0.…”
Section: Effect Of Nanoparticle Concentration On Sers Enhancement Of ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The pressing need for innovative methods to detect multiple contaminations in both environment and food is clear, and the research on new analytical sorbents and techniques to use in this eld is crucial. [6][7][8][9] Triple-quadrupole mass spectrometers coupled with liquid chromatography (LC) are commonly used in pesticide residue analyses, employing the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode for enhanced specicity. However, the capability to simultaneously monitor compounds is constrained by dwell time, limiting peak data acquisition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the detection time was long, and the pathogenic bacteria were lethal in the process of processing and could not be detected. Besides, several electrochemical biosensors, chemiluminescence assay, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) assay, and fluorescence assay were also developed to detect SEs. Alternatively, SERS biosensors possessed high sensitivity down to single-molecule detection and showed potential for application in biological molecule analysis, environmental monitoring, , and disease diagnosis, and would be a promising tool for reliable SE detection. However, there were still some issues to be solved for SERS signal-dependent sensitive and accurate SE detection: (1) the high and non-interference SERS signals for ultrasensitive and precise detection; (2) the uniform position of Raman labels on the surface of SERS for the production of reproducible SERS signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%