2020
DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1817796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A serological survey of SARS-CoV-2 in cat in Wuhan

Abstract: COVID-19 is a new respiratory illness caused by SARS-CoV-2, and has constituted a global public health emergency. Cat is susceptible to SARS-CoV-2. However, the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in cats remains largely unknown. Here, we investigated the infection of SARS-CoV-2 in cats during COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan by serological detection methods. A cohort of serum samples were collected from cats in Wuhan, including 102 sampled after COVID-19 outbreak, and 39 prior to the outbreak. Fifteen sera collected after the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

34
365
7
10

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(417 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
34
365
7
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Both virological and serological testing found evidence for natural SARS-CoV-2 infection in two dogs from households with human cases of COVID-19 in Hong Kong, but the dogs appeared asymptomatic 45 . Another serological study detected SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies in cat serum samples collected in Wuhan after the COVID-19 outbreak, providing evidence for SARS-CoV-2 infection in cat populations in Wuhan, although the potential of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from cats to humans is currently uncertain 46 .…”
Section: Animal Host and Spillovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both virological and serological testing found evidence for natural SARS-CoV-2 infection in two dogs from households with human cases of COVID-19 in Hong Kong, but the dogs appeared asymptomatic 45 . Another serological study detected SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies in cat serum samples collected in Wuhan after the COVID-19 outbreak, providing evidence for SARS-CoV-2 infection in cat populations in Wuhan, although the potential of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from cats to humans is currently uncertain 46 .…”
Section: Animal Host and Spillovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The substitution of E37 with glutamine shifts the electrostatic feature to the opposite and might contribute to the decreased ability of civet ACE2 to interact with SARS-CoV-2 RBD. Multiple evidence supports the susceptibility of cats to SARS-CoV-2, including the cat samples in Wuhan collected after the outbreak circulating the antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 23,32 . In this study, the SARS-CoV-2 RBD is found to interact with the cACE2, albeit with a lower binding affinity than with hACE2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, cats and ferrets are permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection and cats experimentally transmit SARS-CoV-2 to naïve cats 22 . Notably, 14.7% (15/102) cat sera collected after the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan were positive for the SARS-CoV-2, while 39 cat sera collected prior to the outbreak are negative, demonstrating that SARS-CoV-2 infected the cat population in Wuhan during the outbreak 23 . Despite these reports and suspicions, the real intermediate host for SARS-CoV-2 remains elusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two serological surveys with cats, one of which also includes dogs (102). In an unpublished study, 11 of 102 cats had neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that under natural conditions, cats exposed to SARS-CoV-2 develop antibodies (103). These samples were obtained after the outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China (103).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an unpublished study, 11 of 102 cats had neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that under natural conditions, cats exposed to SARS-CoV-2 develop antibodies (103). These samples were obtained after the outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China (103). In another serological study also in the Wuhan region, antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were investigated in 35 animal species (102).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%