1998
DOI: 10.20506/rst.17.3.1131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A serological survey of bovine brucellosis in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
7
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are various researchers who reported management wise prevalence of bovine brucellosis in India. In this study, the results coincided with the findings of Isloor et al [26][27][28] showing that a higher prevalence of brucellosis was observed in organized farms than in single cow herds. This may be attributed to the spread of infection that is quick, easily spread and mainly due to the improper screening, surveillance and monitoring.…”
Section: Husbandry Practices-wise Prevalence Of Bovine Brucellosis Bysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There are various researchers who reported management wise prevalence of bovine brucellosis in India. In this study, the results coincided with the findings of Isloor et al [26][27][28] showing that a higher prevalence of brucellosis was observed in organized farms than in single cow herds. This may be attributed to the spread of infection that is quick, easily spread and mainly due to the improper screening, surveillance and monitoring.…”
Section: Husbandry Practices-wise Prevalence Of Bovine Brucellosis Bysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Lower incidence indicates the effective implementation of regular testing and culling of seropositive animals. Perusal of the literature indicated prevalence of brucellosis in western region (Gujarat state) was ranging from 8.98 to 44.00% (Sutariya et al 2005;Chauhan et al 2000), 17% in southern region (Isloor et al 1998), 6.3% in central region (Madhya Pradesh state) (Mehra et al 2000) and 12.9% in northern region (Punjab state) (Dhand et al 2005). In other countries, sero-prevalence of brucellosis was reported to be 3.1% in Ethiopia (Ibrahim et al 2009), 6.5% in Jordan (Al-Majali et al 2009), 8.4% in Cameroon (Bayemi et al 2009) and 32.92 to 39.45% in Turkey (Sahin et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several bacterial and viral infectious agents like Brucella abortus, bovine herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1), Leptospira spp etc. may be responsible for abortions in dairy animals (Isloor et al 1998;Mariya et al 2007). A high sero prevalence (17%) of bovine brucellosis has been reported in Indian dairy herds with the history of abortions (Isloor et al 1998) and the organism could also be isolated from aborted material in cattle (Chahota et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Senthil et al conducted a seroprevalence study of bovine brucellosis in Chennai, India utilizing various diagnostic tests with positive results ranging from 3.3% – 11.4% [11]. Isloor et al found overall prevalence was 1.9% in cattle and 1.8% in buffalo [12]. Long-term serological studies indicate baseline seroprevalence of 5% in cattle and 3% in buffalo [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%