2012
DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzs096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A series of anti-CEA/anti-DOTA bispecific antibody formats evaluated for pre-targeting: comparison of tumor uptake and blood clearance

Abstract: A series of anti-tumor/anti-chelate bispecific antibody formats were developed for pre-targeted radioimmunotherapy. Based on the anti-carcinoembryonic antigen humanized hT84.66-M5A monoclonal antibody and the anti-DOTA C8.2.5 scFv antibody fragment, this cognate series of bispecific antibodies were radioiodinated to determine their tumor targeting, biodistribution and pharmacokinetic properties in a mouse xenograft tumor model. The in vivo biodistribution studies showed that all the bispecific antibodies exhib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8][9][10][11] However, there are more examples of aberrant pharmacokinetic observations for bispecific mAbs that are unexplainable, and not readily attributable to these 'other' mechanisms that can influence mAb disposition. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Since these inferior in vivo properties can limit the potential advantages offered pharmacologically, further study of factors influencing their disposition is critical to their successful development for therapeutic application. In addition, despite the increased emphasis on developing these more complex structures, there remains a substantial gap in understanding the factors in vivo that result in the aberrant peripheral clearance of some bispecific antibodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11] However, there are more examples of aberrant pharmacokinetic observations for bispecific mAbs that are unexplainable, and not readily attributable to these 'other' mechanisms that can influence mAb disposition. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Since these inferior in vivo properties can limit the potential advantages offered pharmacologically, further study of factors influencing their disposition is critical to their successful development for therapeutic application. In addition, despite the increased emphasis on developing these more complex structures, there remains a substantial gap in understanding the factors in vivo that result in the aberrant peripheral clearance of some bispecific antibodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third class of molecules are appended IgGs with symmetric architecture in which the second binding site is fused to either the IgG heavy or light chain in a symmetrical fashion. 12-15 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Since then, the secondary binding site, often in an scFv format, has been fused to the C terminus/N terminus of the heavy chain, the hinge region, the C terminus/N terminus of the light chain, the CH3 domain of the heavy chain, or other regions. 2527 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%