1992
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7519(92)90106-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A serial study of rejection of Trichostrongylus colubriformis by immune sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Miller et al [20] reported that immune sheep prevented the establishment and expelled the majority of Haemonchus contortus L3 within 48 h post infection, with more than 95% of the larval challenge failing to establish in the immune tissue. Similar expulsion rates were observed in immune sheep infected with a Trichostrongylus colubriformis larval challenge [17]. An in vitro method has recently been developed, in which abomasal tissue explants were challenged with exsheathed Teladorsagia (T .)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Miller et al [20] reported that immune sheep prevented the establishment and expelled the majority of Haemonchus contortus L3 within 48 h post infection, with more than 95% of the larval challenge failing to establish in the immune tissue. Similar expulsion rates were observed in immune sheep infected with a Trichostrongylus colubriformis larval challenge [17]. An in vitro method has recently been developed, in which abomasal tissue explants were challenged with exsheathed Teladorsagia (T .)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This suggests that two independent immune mechanisms may be operating towards T. colubriformis and T. circumcincta, such as inhibition of the development of the fourth larval stage in T. circumcincta (Smith, 2007) and rapid expulsion of T. colubriformis larvae (McClure et al, 1992). Alternatively, a difference in the effectiveness of the same immune response may explain the difference in resistance to the two species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also enhances activation of and killing by mature eosinophils [3] and is involved in their local recruitment [4]. Eosinophilia is a consistent feature accompanying parasite and fungal infections in humans [5], mice [2] and sheep [6], with marked infiltration of mucosal tissues occurring after infection with gastrointestinal (GI) nematodes [7]. In an attempt to delineate the role of IL-5 and eosinophilia in worm infections, Coffman et al [3] showed that a mAb which neutralizes murine IL-5 abrogated the blood and tissue eosinophilia following infection with Nippostrongylus brasiliensis, although this had no effect on parasite sur- vival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%