Sigir ’94 1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-2099-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sequential Algorithm for Training Text Classifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
238
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,013 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
238
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The active learning literature have also proposed a variety of ways to choose which data should be labeled [1,12,17,18]. However, it has been shown that the frequency and repetition of questions can affect the accuracy and compliance with experience sampling [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The active learning literature have also proposed a variety of ways to choose which data should be labeled [1,12,17,18]. However, it has been shown that the frequency and repetition of questions can affect the accuracy and compliance with experience sampling [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blum and Mitchell [16] provided the first formalization of learning in the multi-view framework, and proved that two independent, compatible views can be used to PAClearn [17], a concept based on few labeled and many unlabeled examples. At the meantime, they also introduced Co-Training, the first general-purpose, multiview algorithm.…”
Section: B Multiple Views Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVSL, the most common active learning method, uses single classifier from one view to acquire the hypothesis. Such as the uncertainty sampling approach [17] and EM [19] belong to SVSL. Combination of SVSL and CoTraining, each of multi-views adopts one classifier to sampling, that is MVSL.…”
Section: B Multiple Views Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each combination of independent variables, we record: LGF performance metric proposed by Lewis and Gale [5], assume equal weights for recall and precision.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%