2014
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sequence of events model of episodic memory shows parallels in rats and humans

Abstract: A critical feature of episodic memory is the ability to remember the order of events as they occurred in time, a capacity shared across species including humans, nonhuman primates, and rodents. Accumulating evidence suggests that this capacity depends on a network of structures including the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex, but their respective contributions remain poorly understood. As addressing this important issue will require converging evidence from complementary investigative techniques, we develo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
82
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were two types of OutSeq items in the dataset: Repeats, in which an earlier item was presented a second time in the sequence (e.g., ABADE), and Skips, in which an item was presented too early in the sequence (e.g., ABDDE, which skipped over item C). Although our previous work has revealed important differences in performance and neural activity on Repeats and Skips (Allen et al, 2014, this distinction was beyond the scope of the present analyses and not further discussed here. Note that OutSeq items could be presented in any sequence position except the first (i.e., sequences always began with odor A, though odor A could also be presented later in the sequence as a Repeat).…”
Section: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There were two types of OutSeq items in the dataset: Repeats, in which an earlier item was presented a second time in the sequence (e.g., ABADE), and Skips, in which an item was presented too early in the sequence (e.g., ABDDE, which skipped over item C). Although our previous work has revealed important differences in performance and neural activity on Repeats and Skips (Allen et al, 2014, this distinction was beyond the scope of the present analyses and not further discussed here. Note that OutSeq items could be presented in any sequence position except the first (i.e., sequences always began with odor A, though odor A could also be presented later in the sequence as a Repeat).…”
Section: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Similarly, although the low incidence of sequence cells precludes a thorough analysis of their distribution in each animal, the observation of a high proportion of sequence cells in section 2 was generally consistent across animals. Fourth, although we have previously examined potential strategies and cognitive representations supporting performance of this task in rodents and humans (see Allen et al, 2014Allen et al, , 2015, including item-item associations (e.g., "B is followed by C") or item-position associations (e.g., "C is the third item in the sequence"), the present study was not designed to link the use of a specific strategy with the distribution of sequence coding in CA1. This assessment would require new experiments in which neural activity is recorded while biasing the animals toward the use of distinct strategies using different versions of the task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations