2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4611-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sequel to Sanger: amplicon sequencing that scales

Abstract: BackgroundAlthough high-throughput sequencers (HTS) have largely displaced their Sanger counterparts, the short read lengths and high error rates of most platforms constrain their utility for amplicon sequencing. The present study tests the capacity of single molecule, real-time (SMRT) sequencing implemented on the SEQUEL platform to overcome these limitations, employing 658 bp amplicons of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I gene as a model system.ResultsBy examining templates from more than 5000 species… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
171
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
171
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Long sequencing reads have the potential to provide many benefits for DNA metabarcoding. These include taxonomic assignment of OTUs at lower taxonomic levels (Franzén et al, ; Porter & Golding, ), the use of homology‐based classification and phylogenetic reconstruction (Tedersoo et al, ) and higher sequencing quality for standard length DNA barcodes in reference databases (Hebert et al, ). Disadvantages of long reads include lower sequence quality (D'Amore et al, ; Glenn, ), a possible increase in the rate of chimera formation and the fact that most bioinformatics tools are optimized for shorter reads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Long sequencing reads have the potential to provide many benefits for DNA metabarcoding. These include taxonomic assignment of OTUs at lower taxonomic levels (Franzén et al, ; Porter & Golding, ), the use of homology‐based classification and phylogenetic reconstruction (Tedersoo et al, ) and higher sequencing quality for standard length DNA barcodes in reference databases (Hebert et al, ). Disadvantages of long reads include lower sequence quality (D'Amore et al, ; Glenn, ), a possible increase in the rate of chimera formation and the fact that most bioinformatics tools are optimized for shorter reads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long sequencing reads have the potential to provide many benefits for DNA metabarcoding. These include taxonomic assignment of OTUs at lower taxonomic levels (Franzén et al, 2015;Porter & Golding, 2011), the use of homology-based classification and phylogenetic reconstruction (Tedersoo et al, 2017) and higher sequencing quality for standard length DNA barcodes in reference databases (Hebert et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA barcode studies initially focused on developing the analytical protocols to construct a specimen‐based reference library (Hebert et al, ; Hebert, Penton, Burns, Janzen, & Hallwachs, ). Although improved protocols have reduced costs, leading to the analysis of millions of single specimens (Hajibabaei et al, ; Hebert et al, ; Ivanova, deWaard, & Hebert, ), this approach is too expensive to support large‐scale bio‐monitoring programmes. However, by coupling a DNA barcode reference library with the analytical capacity of high‐throughput sequencers (HTS), DNA metabarcoding provides a path to rapid, low‐cost assessments of species composition (Brandon‐Mong et al, ; Hajibabaei, Shokralla, Zhou, Singer, & Baird, ; Moriniere et al, ; Yu et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have now employed this approach to assess species composition in communities of aquatic and terrestrial arthropods (Beng et al, 2016;Elbrecht, Vamos, Meissner, Aroviita, & Leese, 2017;Ji et al, 2013), vertebrates (Sato, Sogo, Doi, & Yamanaka, 2017), diatoms (Vasselon et al, 2017) and fungi (Aas, Davey, & Kauserud, 2017;Bellemain et al, 2012;Tedersoo, Tooming-Klunderud, & Anslan, 2018). Such metabarcoding analysis routinely reveals more species than morphological approaches while requiring far less time (Brandon-Mong et al, 2015;Elbrecht, Peinert, & Leese, 2017;Elbrecht, Vamos et al, 2017;Hebert et al, 2018;Ji et al, 2013;Shokralla et al, 2015;Vivien, Lejzerowicz, & Pawlowski, 2016;Yu et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with classic DNA barcoding approaches, incomplete reference databases are often a key factor in causing false negatives. Fortunately, HTS‐based methods have promised feasible paths in producing both standard DNA barcodes (Hebert et al, ; Liu, Yang, Zhou, & Zhou, ; Srivathsan et al, ) and organelle genomes (Straub et al, ; Tang et al, ) at significantly reduced costs. Indeed, large sequencing efforts for plastid genomes have seen significant progress in China.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%