1972
DOI: 10.1007/bf01932308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sentence generator for testing parsers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Purdom's algorithm generates small sentences efficiently with the goal to use each production rule at least once [29].…”
Section: A Brief Survey Of Test Cases Generation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Purdom's algorithm generates small sentences efficiently with the goal to use each production rule at least once [29].…”
Section: A Brief Survey Of Test Cases Generation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm was designed by Purdom [29] in 1972 and only a very high-level logic in imperative style description was given. In the original description it is not clear when the algorithm is to stop generating sentences or how the two main routines, the parsing and the referee routine, communicate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental work in this field is the paper [2]. Later, it was used as a departure point by many other researchers, who either modified the Purdom algorithm suggested in this work or compared it with their own algorithms.…”
Section: Testing Of Syntax Analyzermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Coverage criteria for grammars has been studied in [6] where a family of test criteria for CFGs is described and analyzed. There are also algorithms for automatic sentence generation such as Purdom's algorithm [12] and its extension [14]. We do not discuss deeply about the details of these techniques.…”
Section: Not Acceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the implementation, we adopted Earley's algorithm [1] for sentence recognition, Purdom's algorithm [12] for sentence generation and Lämmel's context-dependent rule coverage [5] for coverage analysis. We have not implemented any algorithm for ambiguity detection but simply resorted to Bison by checking the shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts reported by it.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%