A sensory perspective in the Italian beer market

Abstract

Purpose From literature, an uncovered issue around the customer-based brand equity (CBBE) is detected: the influence of sensorial preferences on the relationship between social media communication and CBBE. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects produced by social media brand communication – both firm-created content (FCC) and user-generated content (UGC) – on CBBE, according to the sensorial preferences in the beer industry. Design/methodology/approach A literature review has been used to develop a research model and hypotheses. The research is based on online survey carried out on a sample of 183 valid questionnaires of Italian active fans and followers in the beer industry. A multi-group analysis applied to structural equation modeling is used. Findings The sensory dimension prevails limiting the operating range of brand awareness that does not strongly affect CBBE. In brand equity development’ process, non-sensorial users do not consider sensorial preferences. The brand equity can become stronger by stimulating the reaction of customers through firms’ communication by using social media platforms. Therefore, the quality of peer interactions in the social media communication has a positive impact on brand loyalty. When firms use social media communication to increase overall brand equity, they have to foster and monitor FCC and UGC responses that affect different CBBE components. Originality/value The paper provides empirical evidence about the relationship between social media communication and CBBE, according to the importance given to sensorial preferences by beer lovers. This can be considered as the first study on this specific topic focused on the CBBE issue.

The strategic role of intellectual capital components in agri-food firms

“…In addition to this, there is a series of certifications, such as protected denomination of origin and protected geographical indication, which guarantee the origin of the product (Bandinelli et al, 2020;Rossi et al, 2014). As a result, farms have become competitive in international markets and have undergone a metamorphosis in their production cycle, leaving behind traditional ways of production (Backer et al, 2009;Bresciani et al, 2013;Sadeghi et al, 2019a, b;Cillo et al, 2019a).…”

My name is bond, Pecorino Bond

“…According to the CAOS model (Paoloni, 2011) showing the relationships between parties, the strongest relationship is between variables S and A—the informal and permanent relationships (Cavicchi and Vagnoni, 2018; Inkinen, 2016). Other relationships outlined in the body of the paper, between variables S and C and between S and O (Cillo et al , 2019; Scuotto et al , 2017; Scuotto et al , 2017), are characterized by relationships subsequent and consequent to the informal and permanent relationship (Al Saifi, 2015; McIver and Wang, 2016) between variables S and A—the territory (the company and Regione Sardegna) and its local product (Pecorino Cheese).…”

“…The relations (Cillo et al , 2019; Scuotto et al , 2017) are important in order to understand how the networks support the enterprise in developing a business.…”

The role of community: CSA member retention

“…In one study, a stronger sense of community with their online brand community was indirectly related to loyalty through key variables such as trust (Laroche et al, 2013). In another study, researchers found that beer enthusiasts who evaluated user-generated social media communication more positively also showed greater brand loyalty (Cillo et al, 2019). Similarly, Salgado and Vela (2019) found that loyalty among students could be increased through more engagement in their virtual community with their university via a "brand fan page.…”