2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2014.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sensitivity-based structural damage identification method with unknown input excitation using transmissibility concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modal parameters including natural frequency, damping ratio, and mode shape are the basic dynamic characteristics of structures that can reflect structural changes . Although these parameters can be obtained by numerical analysis or scaled laboratory experiments, errors from measurement, modeling, and numerical calculation always exist .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modal parameters including natural frequency, damping ratio, and mode shape are the basic dynamic characteristics of structures that can reflect structural changes . Although these parameters can be obtained by numerical analysis or scaled laboratory experiments, errors from measurement, modeling, and numerical calculation always exist .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drift is caused by acceleration's insensitivity to any quasi-static component in the input force [21,22]. Although some regularization methods or postsignal processing schemes can be adopted to deal with the drift in the identified results [33][34][35][36], they are not suitable for the real-time identification of coupled state/input/parameter. In [38], a method dealing with joint state and parameter identification was presented.…”
Section: Data Fusion Of Acceleration and Displacement In Egdfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been demonstrated that the conventional GDF approach based on limited number of acceleration measurements is inherently unstable which leads to the so-called spurious low-frequency drift in the estimates of the force and the structural displacement [22]. Although some regularization methods or postsignal processing schemes can be adopted to deal with the drift in the identified results [33][34][35][36], they prohibit the real-time identification of coupled state/input/parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often difficult to directly measure external excitations, so it is necessary to study methodologies for the identification of structures under unknown excitations 27 . So far, KF‐UI based approaches have been developed to identify structural states and unknown excitations 28–30 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%