Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2487788.2488101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sensitive Twitter earthquake detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Pritchard et al 2012) and "How can crisis management and decision-making be supported using social media?" (MacEachren et al 2011a;Yin et al 2012;Robinson et al 2013). Event detection encompasses questions such as "How can important events be distinguished from not-relevant groups of information in a large volume of data?"…”
Section: A General Comparison Of Research On Microblogging Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Pritchard et al 2012) and "How can crisis management and decision-making be supported using social media?" (MacEachren et al 2011a;Yin et al 2012;Robinson et al 2013). Event detection encompasses questions such as "How can important events be distinguished from not-relevant groups of information in a large volume of data?"…”
Section: A General Comparison Of Research On Microblogging Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All dynamic approaches exploit the APIs provided by Twitter to collect and query data: Streaming APIs (Twitter 2016), Search APIs (Twitter 2016), and REST APIs (Twitter 2016) In some cases, a combination of them is also adopted (e.g. (Yin et al 2012;Robinson et al 2013;Cao et al 2012;Abel et al 2012a, b;Rui et al 2012)). A particular case is represented by (Sabty et al 2013); the authors adopt a self-developed infrastructure called RADAR, which mixes Fig.…”
Section: Static Vs Dynamicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boudreau (2011) argues that whereas social media should be about people 'communicating, sharing, interacting, contributing, bonding [and] networking', the reality is that the most popular platforms such as LinkedIn, YouTube, Google+, Facebook and Twitter exclude people with disabilities from participating and '[could not] do any worse if they tried'. In spite of Twitter's 0% accessibility rating (Boudreau 2011), the micro blogging platform is frequently heralded as vital to communications strategies in disaster situations (Grandoni 2012;Liu, Liu, and Li 2012;Robinson, Power, and Cameron 2013). Grandoni (2012) suggests tweeters adopt a particular strategy in order to get as much accurate information into the public realm of people who need it as possible.…”
Section: Social Media and Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…).With 241 million monthly active users, more than 35 languages supported, and over 500 million tweets sent per day, Twitter is perhaps the most popular outlet when it comes to disseminate disaster-related information. A growing literature on methods to mine Twitter data for disaster management confirms this emerging trend [8,9,10,11].…”
Section: Local Information and Global Responsementioning
confidence: 99%