A Sensitive Analytical Procedure for the Determination of Primary and Secondary Alkanolamines in Air

Serbin, Larry; Birkholz, Detlef

doi:10.1080/15428119591017330

Cited by 9 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These methods have been used with various detection modes such as electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESIMS), 16 chemiluminescence, 17 pulsed amperometry, 2,18,19 suppressed conductivity, 20,21 refractometry 22 and UV detector (after derivatization with 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate). 23–25 Headley et al even revised the analytical methods for the determination of alkanolamines such as diethanolamine (DEA) and methyl-diethanolamine (MDEA). 26 Plasmonic sensors based on the theoretical concept of metal–insulator–metal (MIM) geometry and micro-ring-based sensors have also been reported.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selective detection of diethanolamine utilizing an LMR/LSPR-based optical fiber sensor

Kavita

Kumari

Gupta

et al. 2022

Analyst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selective detection of diethanolamine utilizing an LMR/LSPR-based optical fiber sensor

Kavita

Kumari

Gupta

et al. 2022

Analyst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In their method, the excess FMOC was removed by extraction with pentane 7) . However, that procedure was not sufficient to remove excess FMOC and may cause loss of the analytes.…”

Section: Modification Of the Published Sample Preparation Procedures Amentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The relative standard deviations, which represent the overall reproducibility defined as precision, were 0.3-1.6 and 0. Osaka Office, Sigma-Aldrich Japan K.K., Japan, liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection 7) . The purpose of this study was the development of a robust method for simultaneous determination of MEA and DEA in workplace air with the sampling capacity and sensitivity required for the MHLW exposure survey.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Filter cassettes containing sulfuric acid-treated glass fiber filters were used as air samplers for alkanolamines (such as MEA and DEA) in a recent report 4) . Most analytical methods for alkanolamines require a derivatization procedure because direct analysis is generally difficult [5][6][7] . Serbin et al reported a simple derivatization procedure using 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl chloride (FMOC-Cl) for high-performance The purpose of this research was to develop a simultaneous determination method for monoethanolamine (MEA) and diethanolamine (DEA) in workplace air for risk assessment.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Determination Method for Mono‐ and Diethanolamine in Workplace Air by High‐performance Liquid Chromatography

Takeuchi

Kitade

Jukurogi³

et al. 2012

Journal of Occupational Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A simple gas chromatography method for the analysis of monoethanolamine in air

Gerster

Hopf²,

Huynh³

et al. 2012

J of Separation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A simple method determining airborne monoethanolamine has been developed. Monoethanolamine determination has traditionally been difficult due to analytical separation problems. Even in recent sophisticated methods, this difficulty remains as the major issue often resulting in time-consuming sample preparations. Impregnated glass fiber filters were used for sampling. Desorption of monoethanolamine was followed by capillary GC analysis and nitrogen phosphorous selective detection. Separation was achieved using a specific column for monoethanolamines (35% diphenyl and 65% dimethyl polysiloxane). The internal standard was quinoline. Derivatization steps were not needed. The calibration range was 0.5-80 μg/mL with a good correlation (R(2) = 0.996). Averaged overall precisions and accuracies were 4.8% and -7.8% for intraday (n = 30), and 10.5% and -5.9% for interday (n = 72). Mean recovery from spiked filters was 92.8% for the intraday variation, and 94.1% for the interday variation. Monoethanolamine on stored spiked filters was stable for at least 4 weeks at 5°C. This newly developed method was used among professional cleaners and air concentrations (n = 4) were 0.42 and 0.17 mg/m(3) for personal and 0.23 and 0.43 mg/m(3) for stationary measurements. The monoethanolamine air concentration method described here was simple, sensitive, and convenient both in terms of sampling and analytical analysis.

show abstract

A Sensitive Analytical Procedure for the Determination of Primary and Secondary Alkanolamines in Air

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Selective detection of diethanolamine utilizing an LMR/LSPR-based optical fiber sensor

Selective detection of diethanolamine utilizing an LMR/LSPR-based optical fiber sensor

Determination Method for Mono‐ and Diethanolamine in Workplace Air by High‐performance Liquid Chromatography

A simple gas chromatography method for the analysis of monoethanolamine in air

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About