Abstract:As one of the largest evaluative and only quantitative study of smartphone-assisted M-Learning in undergraduate medical education, MBChB Mobile suggests that smartphone and application technology enhances students' learning experience. Barriers to implementation may be addressed through the provision of tailored learning resources, along with user-defined support systems, and appropriate means of ensuring acceptability to patients.
“…Some practice mentors reportedly reinforced this by deeming it unacceptable (unlike notebook and pen) to use the device in front of clients. Green et al (2015) found that only 29.2% of 274 senior medical students (strongly) agreed with: "I consider it professional to use an iPhone in a clinical setting," despite receiving an official device loaded with academic, assessment, and logging/ reflective software for such use. Consequently, that medical school provided branded cases for the clinical setting, reinforcing that mobile learning represented the official curriculum.…”
Section: Evidence For Context From Systematic Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mobile device facilitated such performance analysis. Besides use in mini-CEX (Ferenchick et al 2013;Green et al 2015), other assessment uses included: Snodgrass et al's (2016) pilot study evaluated favorably formative feedback via iPADs for physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and speech pathology students on clinical placement, using free text and standard statements (mapped to national discipline-specific competencies). The very small study-sample and insufficient detail about analyzing free-text comments weakened this evidence, but overall most students evaluated the system positively, e.g.…”
Section: Evidence For Context From Systematic Reviewsmentioning
Linkman (2019) A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review of: What works best for health professions students using mobile (hand-held) devices for educational support on clinical placements?
“…Some practice mentors reportedly reinforced this by deeming it unacceptable (unlike notebook and pen) to use the device in front of clients. Green et al (2015) found that only 29.2% of 274 senior medical students (strongly) agreed with: "I consider it professional to use an iPhone in a clinical setting," despite receiving an official device loaded with academic, assessment, and logging/ reflective software for such use. Consequently, that medical school provided branded cases for the clinical setting, reinforcing that mobile learning represented the official curriculum.…”
Section: Evidence For Context From Systematic Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mobile device facilitated such performance analysis. Besides use in mini-CEX (Ferenchick et al 2013;Green et al 2015), other assessment uses included: Snodgrass et al's (2016) pilot study evaluated favorably formative feedback via iPADs for physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and speech pathology students on clinical placement, using free text and standard statements (mapped to national discipline-specific competencies). The very small study-sample and insufficient detail about analyzing free-text comments weakened this evidence, but overall most students evaluated the system positively, e.g.…”
Section: Evidence For Context From Systematic Reviewsmentioning
Linkman (2019) A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review of: What works best for health professions students using mobile (hand-held) devices for educational support on clinical placements?
“…There are some studies that investigate about the trends of mobile learning [10], the perception of students or teachers [11][12][13][14], their challenges [11,15,16], benefits [11,17,18] but there are few of them related with the real impact of mobile learning [19][20][21][22].…”
The aim of this research is to contribute to the general system education providing new insights and resources. This study performs a quasi-experimental study at University of Salamanca with 30 students to compare results between using an anatomic app for learning and the formal traditional method conducted by a teacher. The findings of the investigation suggest that the performance of learners using mobile apps is statistical better than the students using the traditional method. However, mobile devices should be considered as an additional tool to complement the teachers' explanation and it is necessary to overcome different barriers and challenges to adopt these pedagogical methods at University.
“…As the type of hardware might be a major hurdle for the adoption of e-learning resources, many schools have started to either require students to buy and bring their own electronic devices or to make them available as part of the learning environment. 32,33 Although the number of students who reported device challenges in our study was small, it remains an important consideration when designing e-learning resources to accommodate users that are unfamiliar with how to navigate high-tech tools, do not have access to a smartphone or tablet, lack the necessary technological environment, and/or are experiencing website or app dysfunctions. Having e-learning resources available in different interfaces to accommodate a maximal number of students and technological environments may therefore be a good choice.…”
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.