Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2021.126117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A semi-implicit hybrid finite volume/finite element scheme for all Mach number flows on staggered unstructured meshes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
(263 reference statements)
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, other semiimplicit methods have been proposed [9,19,20,36,52] where a linearly implicit scheme is derived for the stiff terms in the governing equations, thus avoiding any need of iterative solvers. Let us mention that, semi-implicit hybrid finite volume/finite element schemes have been recently proposed in [3,14], while semi-implicit methods coupled with discontinuous Galerkin (DG) space discretizations on unstructured staggered meshes have been forwarded for compressible flows [66], on dynamic adaptive meshes [30] and for axially symmetric flows [35]. In most of the aforementioned works, the convective terms of the governing equations are discretized explicitly, because they typically involve a nonlinearity which is difficult to be implicitly solved, requiring the usage of computationally time consuming and numerically less stable nonlinear solvers for the resulting system that need to be inverted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, other semiimplicit methods have been proposed [9,19,20,36,52] where a linearly implicit scheme is derived for the stiff terms in the governing equations, thus avoiding any need of iterative solvers. Let us mention that, semi-implicit hybrid finite volume/finite element schemes have been recently proposed in [3,14], while semi-implicit methods coupled with discontinuous Galerkin (DG) space discretizations on unstructured staggered meshes have been forwarded for compressible flows [66], on dynamic adaptive meshes [30] and for axially symmetric flows [35]. In most of the aforementioned works, the convective terms of the governing equations are discretized explicitly, because they typically involve a nonlinearity which is difficult to be implicitly solved, requiring the usage of computationally time consuming and numerically less stable nonlinear solvers for the resulting system that need to be inverted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we now take into account that explicit FV methods are well suited for solving hyperbolic equations and implicit FE methods are well known to be suitable and efficient for the solution of elliptic Poisson-type problems, we will end up with a hybrid FV/FE methodology that solves each subproblem with the most suitable scheme. The operator splitting between pressure-independent purely convective terms and pressure terms can also be extended to the compressible case, see [23][24][25][26][27][28], keeping a reasonable time step restriction depending only on the velocity field, rather than on the sound speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A careful discretization of the governing PDE system is therefore needed, which is able to deal with both low and high Reynolds number flows. In this paper, we aim at extending the hybrid FV/FE methodology presented in the series of papers [27][28][29][30][31][32], to the case of turbulent flows and non-Newtonian power-law fluids with yield stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, other semi-implicit methods have been proposed [40,34,18,19,9] where a linearly implicit scheme is derived for the stiff terms in the governing equations, thus avoiding any need of iterative solvers. Let us mention that, semi-implicit hybrid finite volume/finite element schemes have been recently proposed in [13,3], while semi-implicit methods coupled with discontinuous Galerkin (DG) space discretizations on unstructured staggered meshes have been forwarded for compressible flows [48], on dynamic adaptive meshes [29] and for axially symmetric flows [33]. In most of the aforementioned works, the convective terms of the governing equations are discretized explicitly, because they typically involve a nonlinearity which is difficult to be implicitly solved, requiring the usage of computationally time consuming and numerically less stable nonlinear solvers for the resulting system that need to be inverted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%