A Semi-Automated Workflow for FAIR Maturity Indicators in the Life Sciences

Abstract

Data sharing and reuse are crucial to enhance scientific progress and maximize return of investments in science. Although attitudes are increasingly favorable, data reuse remains difficult due to lack of infrastructures, standards, and policies. The FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) principles aim to provide recommendations to increase data reuse. Because of the broad interpretation of the FAIR principles, maturity indicators are necessary to determine the FAIRness of a dataset. In this work, we propose a reproducible computational workflow to assess data FAIRness in the life sciences. Our implementation follows principles and guidelines recommended by the maturity indicator authoring group and integrates concepts from the literature. In addition, we propose a FAIR balloon plot to summarize and compare dataset FAIRness. We evaluated the feasibility of our method on three real use cases where researchers looked for six datasets to answer their scientific questions. We retrieved information from repositories (ArrayExpress, Gene Expression Omnibus, eNanoMapper, caNanoLab, NanoCommons and ChEMBL), a registry of repositories, and a searchable resource (Google Dataset Search) via application program interfaces (API) wherever possible. With our analysis, we found that the six datasets met the majority of the criteria defined by the maturity indicators, and we showed areas where improvements can easily be reached. We suggest that use of standard schema for metadata and the presence of specific attributes in registries of repositories could increase FAIRness of datasets.

Manually curated transcriptomics data collection for toxicogenomic assessment of engineered nanomaterials

“…The FAIR principles for scientific data were defined in 2016 and have since been the guide for more Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable data 3 . The FAIRness of ENM-relevant databases, including ArrayExpress, the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), eNa-noMapper and NanoCommons have recently been evaluated, and while the six datasets extracted from these met the majority of the criteria defined by the FAIR maturity indicators, areas identified for improvement included the use of standard schema for metadata and the presence of specific attributes in registries of repositories that would increase the FAIRness of datasets 4 . In order to unleash the full potential of already existing transcriptomics data 1 Metadata curation.…”

ELIXIR and Toxicology: a community in development

“…Despite the work of many projects, their FAIR features can still be improved and applying newly developed FAIR metrics will help steer this. 48 Even though there is overlap in content with existing ELIXIR Communities (Table 1, key demands specifically fostering the integration for interoperable toxicology and risk assessment include the following roadmap 19,20 ):…”

FAIRification of nanosafety data to improve applicability of (Q)SAR approaches: A case study on in vitro Comet assay genotoxicity data

“…The FAIR principles have emerged in response to the realization that research data is not reused to its full potential [29] . The principles support reuse by setting guidelines for four central needs: data needs to be Findable through persistent identifiers and metadata 2 , Accessible through either open or authorized computational means, Interoperable with computational systems and other types of data in order to allow for further analysis and integration ( e.g.…”