2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11012-015-0318-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A semi-analytic strategy for the system-level modelling of flexibly supported ball bearings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The interpolation of these displacement modes is based on the parameter(s) describing the rigid-body configuration of the multibody system. In the field of bearing analysis, Fiszer et al [8] proposes to combine the aforementioned PMOR technique with a semi-analytic contact model similar to the one described in [1]. The total deformation is separated in the global deformation of the rings and their support, represented by a parametrically reduced order model, and the non-linear local Hertzian deflections at the contact zone.…”
Section: Flexible Multibody Models For Gear Contact Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpolation of these displacement modes is based on the parameter(s) describing the rigid-body configuration of the multibody system. In the field of bearing analysis, Fiszer et al [8] proposes to combine the aforementioned PMOR technique with a semi-analytic contact model similar to the one described in [1]. The total deformation is separated in the global deformation of the rings and their support, represented by a parametrically reduced order model, and the non-linear local Hertzian deflections at the contact zone.…”
Section: Flexible Multibody Models For Gear Contact Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the already reduced model could be further reduced by a modal truncation approach, as followed by Novotny [17] for elastic journal bearings. In addition, a load dependent approach by using free interface normal modes and attachment modes could have been followed (see [18][19][20]). …”
Section: Reduction Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach combines the finite-element method with semi-analytic results from classic contact theory to eliminate the need for highly refined finite-element meshes in the zone of contact (Andersson and Vedmar, 2003;Vijayakar, 1991). The second approach reduces the number of degrees of freedom in the finite-element models by applying model-order-reduction techniques that are specifically tailored toward dynamic contact problems (Blockmans et al, 2015;Fiszer et al, 2016). Given the complexity of these methods, however, the usage of finite-element-method-based techniques to model gears and bearings in system-level drivetrain simulations remains largely restricted to the preprocessing phase of the simulation or limited to static simulations.…”
Section: Modeling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%