2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10515-014-0144-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A semantic web enabled approach to reuse functional requirements models in web engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed system is ''approximative'' and does not guarantee with 100% certainty the suitability of the discovered services to satisfy the needs of the requester. This is in line with the authors' belief that semantic web research has started to shift towards ''more scalable and approximative rather than computationally expensive logic-based reasoning with impractical assumptions'' Paydar and Kahani (2014). Our work disproves this belief: It is possible to have logic-based reasoning that is not prohibitively expensive, provided that an appropriate subset of logic, which is expressive enough to practically specify goal requirements and web service capabilities is used.…”
Section: Related Work On Matchingsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The proposed system is ''approximative'' and does not guarantee with 100% certainty the suitability of the discovered services to satisfy the needs of the requester. This is in line with the authors' belief that semantic web research has started to shift towards ''more scalable and approximative rather than computationally expensive logic-based reasoning with impractical assumptions'' Paydar and Kahani (2014). Our work disproves this belief: It is possible to have logic-based reasoning that is not prohibitively expensive, provided that an appropriate subset of logic, which is expressive enough to practically specify goal requirements and web service capabilities is used.…”
Section: Related Work On Matchingsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The authors of anATLyzer [119] evaluated the usefulness of its quick fixes and the utility of its ranking with respect to the free choices made by two independent developers. Paydar et al [100,101] used the opinion of experts as the golden standard to evaluate the accuracy of their algorithms to detect behaviour/concepts in use cases, annotate activity diagrams with entities from class diagrams and recommend use cases based on similarity metrics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommenders in MDE have been applied to the reuse of models and transformations. Regarding model reuse, SimVMA [132] recommends Simulink models similar to the one that is being developed, and which the designer can import or clone for their reuse; REBUILDER [42] finds UML diagrams similar to a given query, and supports their full or partial composition into the given design; Paydar et al [100,101] propose a reuse technique whereby the designer provides an input UML use case diagram, the most similar use cases are retrieved from a model repository, and then the activity diagrams associated to these use cases are semiautomatically adapted to (i.e. reused in) the new usage context; Koschmider et al [50,51,71] propose both a recommender of process model fragments, and an explicit search facility to retrieve complete process models or fragments and insert them in the current modelling context, adapting them if needed; and Hermes [34][35][36] can incorporate model search strategies to find model elements suitable for reuse.…”
Section: Complete Most Approaches Whose Purpose Is Completingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations