1974
DOI: 10.1109/tac.1974.1100734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A self-tuning predictor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reader can find further details about the algorithm in studies published by Kalman (1960), Wittenmark (1974), Ganendra (1976), Ambrus & Szollôsi-Nagy (1981), Young (1986) etc.…”
Section: Appendix: Recursive Formulae Of Self-tuning Predictormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reader can find further details about the algorithm in studies published by Kalman (1960), Wittenmark (1974), Ganendra (1976), Ambrus & Szollôsi-Nagy (1981), Young (1986) etc.…”
Section: Appendix: Recursive Formulae Of Self-tuning Predictormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). A detailed theoretical description of the self-tuning predictor is given by Wittenmark (1974). The recursive steps of the self-tuning algorithm are also presented by Ganendra (1976), Ambrus (1980) and Iritz (1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The self-tuning predictor was developed by Wittenmark (1974). Hydrological applications of the self-tuning predictor are reported by Ganendra (1976) and Ambrus (1980).…”
Section: Self-tuning Predictor (Setu)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…+ ~21v2(t) (22) where Vl(t ) = Yw(t) and v2(t ) = ~d(t) are respectively synthetic, deterministic, TI~m (hrs) Figure 5 The results of the one-step ahead adaptive predictor Simultaneously, the estimate of eo is considerably adapted in order to track the changing properties of the system's dynamics, of which the structure of the four-step ahead predictor is relatively "ignorant". However after such temporary disturbances returns slowly to its steady-state value for dry-weather conditions thus giving o a good illustration of the adaptability of the predictor (see figure 7).…”
Section: ~(T+llt) = %Y(t) -%9(tlt-1) +~Ovl(t+l) +~Lvl(t) +Y2ov2(t+l)mentioning
confidence: 99%