A self-reinforcement questionnaire

Heiby, Elaine M.

doi:10.1016/0005-7967(82)90100-0

Cited by 65 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This lack of gender differences detected may be a result of a lack of attempts to split the population as it is already small, or as a result of such gender differences being more difficult to detect as males often are a small minority in such studies. However, one study [32] found that males displayed significantly higher scores in the two metacognitive factors: negative beliefs about thoughts, including themes of superstition, punishment, and responsibility; and cognitive self-consciousness. Differences in metacognitive responses have been shown to relate to symptoms of depression differently, yet there is still considerable need for further research in this area.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Also, these metacognitive factors may lead to attempts to control or suppress unwanted thoughts [32]. This suppression of unwanted thoughts may defer psychological stressors for a time, yet paradoxically, it is this suppression that may even act to produce the very preoccupation that was being avoided [47].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The self-reinforcement questionnaire [32]: This is a 30-item scale designed to measure self-reinforcement in meaningful settings. This scale assesses the attitudes towards the self in relation to achievements and failures.…”

Section: Cognitive Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The 3 items selected overlap with the superstition, punishment, and responsibility factor of the MCQ-A as they both delve into the sense of uncontrollability and inevitability of negative events occurring and a sense that there is an external, invisible hand or force directing these events. Such increased accessibility of threat concepts arise when worry progresses towards more problematic meta-worry [32].…”

Section: The Worry Assessment (5 Items) Used In the Oadp Was Adapted mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Concurrent and Prospective Associations between Metacognition and Depression in Adolescents

Russell¹,

Seeley²

2016

J Psychol Abnorm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Cognitive Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Worry Assessment (5 Items) Used In the Oadp Was Adapted mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Concurrent and Prospective Associations between Metacognition and Depression in Adolescents

Russell¹,

Seeley²

2016

J Psychol Abnorm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, accurate assessment of SC is needed to facilitate and inform current and future treatment decisions. There are currently at least four adult self-report questionnaires that have been developed to assess SC: the Self-Control Questionnaire (SCQ; Rehm, Kornblith, O'Hara, Lamparski, Romano, & Volkin, 1981), the Frequency of Self-Reinforcement Questionnaire (FSRQ; Heiby, 1982), the Cognitive Self-Management Test (CSM; Rude, 1986), and the Lifestyle Approaches Inventory (LSA; Williams, Moore, Pettibone, & Thomas, 1992). The purpose of this investigation is to compare the psychometric characteristics of each of these questionnaires, and to draw conclusions regarding their clinical applicability.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparison of Four Measures of Self-Control Skills

Mezo

Heiby

2004

Assessment

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study compares the psychometric characteristics of four questionnaires designed to assess self-control skills: the Self-Control Questionnaire, the Frequency of Self-Reinforcement Questionnaire, the Cognitive Self-Management Test, and the Lifestyle Approaches Inventory. Content validity was judged to be fairly comparable by three raters in Study 1. In Study 2, convergent and divergent validity support was obtained for all four questionnaires when administered to 369 multiethnic college students, but the relative degree of support varied across constructs. Hence, selection of a self-control instrument may be guided by the target behavior of interest.

show abstract

Self-management perceptions and practices: a structural equations analysis

1999

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Self‐management has many potential benefits for organizations. However, application of self‐management to organizational settings has been hampered by lack of theoretical frameworks for self‐management specifically applied to work settings and by a corresponding dearth of psychometrically sound measures. This paper presents results of structural equations modeling of measures of self‐management anchored in a revised version of the Brief and Aldag (1981) model of the self in organizational behavior. Using confirmatory factor analysis procedures (CFA), two a priori measures of self‐management are examined. Results point to two relatively distinct facets of self‐management, each of them composed of four relatively independent subscales. Finally, a structural model evidencing a pervasive set of relationships between self‐management perceptions and self‐management practices is provided. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

show abstract

A self-reinforcement questionnaire

Cited by 65 publications

References 10 publications

Concurrent and Prospective Associations between Metacognition and Depression in Adolescents

Concurrent and Prospective Associations between Metacognition and Depression in Adolescents

A Comparison of Four Measures of Self-Control Skills

Self-management perceptions and practices: a structural equations analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About