2014
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Self‐regulation Perspective on Hidden‐profile Problems: If–Then Planning to Review Information Improves Group Decisions

Abstract: In hidden‐profile (HP) problems, groups squander their potential to make superior decisions because members fail to capitalize on each other's unique knowledge (unshared information). A new self‐regulation perspective suggests that hindrances in goal striving (e.g., failing to seize action opportunities) contribute to this problem. Implementation intentions (if–then plans) are known to help deal with hindrances in goal striving; therefore, supporting decision goals with if–then plans should improve the impact … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(126 reference statements)
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with this interpretation, the response times indicated that ADHD children responded more slowly than control children, especially in the planning condition. This interpretation is also in accordance with behavioral studies that have demonstrated that implementation intentions can improve the initiation of reflective responses such as evaluating a chosen strategy ( Henderson et al, 2007 ), taking an onlooker’s perspective ( Wieber et al, 2015 ), and reviewing the pros and cons of different decision alternatives ( Thürmer et al, 2015b ). Overall, the study by Paul et al (2007) shows that implementation intentions can affect neural activity, as reflected in the first half of the P300 component, and improve response inhibition in children with ADHD.…”
Section: The Present Reviewsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In line with this interpretation, the response times indicated that ADHD children responded more slowly than control children, especially in the planning condition. This interpretation is also in accordance with behavioral studies that have demonstrated that implementation intentions can improve the initiation of reflective responses such as evaluating a chosen strategy ( Henderson et al, 2007 ), taking an onlooker’s perspective ( Wieber et al, 2015 ), and reviewing the pros and cons of different decision alternatives ( Thürmer et al, 2015b ). Overall, the study by Paul et al (2007) shows that implementation intentions can affect neural activity, as reflected in the first half of the P300 component, and improve response inhibition in children with ADHD.…”
Section: The Present Reviewsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Finally, participants in the current research did not make purchases in an actual store. Past research has observed if-then planning effects in incentivized decisions (Thürmer et al, 2015b) and in naturalistic settings (Holland et al, 2006), suggesting that the present findings may generalize to such contexts. Nevertheless, future research should test whether implementation intentions are effective for regulating peer impact on actual purchase decisions and online shopping behaviour.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…These studies were mainly conducted at the individual level and/or in a laboratory setting. Nevertheless, there is also emerging research on the effects of collective implementation intentions (Wieber et al, 2012, 2015a; Thürmer et al, 2015a, 2017) that might also be applied to organizational settings (Thürmer et al, 2015b). Such “we-plans” that specify when, where and how a group acts toward a collective goal should then help collective goal striving that improves performance, and therefore might also be an expedient strategy for reaching goals within OHIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%