1914
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1914.tb07158.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Self‐recording Porometer and Potometer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1917
1917
1947
1947

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conjunction with Mr. Laidlaw this apparatus was modified to render it selfrecording (16), thus obviating the necessity of continuous attention when a continuous record is required. Self-recording porometers had already been described by Balls (4) and by Neilson Jones (25), but these were comparatively elaborate, whilst that devised by Laidlaw and Knight is simple in construction. ' With the help of these forms of apparatus the porometer method was tested with a view to determining its efficiency.…”
Section: R Esearches On Transpiration In Recent Years Have Resultedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conjunction with Mr. Laidlaw this apparatus was modified to render it selfrecording (16), thus obviating the necessity of continuous attention when a continuous record is required. Self-recording porometers had already been described by Balls (4) and by Neilson Jones (25), but these were comparatively elaborate, whilst that devised by Laidlaw and Knight is simple in construction. ' With the help of these forms of apparatus the porometer method was tested with a view to determining its efficiency.…”
Section: R Esearches On Transpiration In Recent Years Have Resultedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements were made on this type of porometer by KNIGHT (7), and by LAIDLAW and KNIGHT (9) who devised a constant flow aspirator and made the process self-recording. Other porometers were devised by BALLs (2), and by JoNEs (6). A porometer which measures changes in the rate of flow of air through the leaves in terms of pressure was devised by GREGORY and PEARSE (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%