1965
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720310065008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Self-Rating Depression Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
3,191
4
102

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8,267 publications
(3,453 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
15
3,191
4
102
Order By: Relevance
“…Depression was measured with the Zung Self‐rating Depression Scale (SDS), a 20‐item self‐report instrument with a 4‐point Likert scale used to evaluate the psychological, affective, and somatic symptoms associated with depression. The overall score to be obtained with this instrument ranges from 25 to 100, where high scores indicate severe symptoms 17. We followed the standard instructions of the Zung and STAI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depression was measured with the Zung Self‐rating Depression Scale (SDS), a 20‐item self‐report instrument with a 4‐point Likert scale used to evaluate the psychological, affective, and somatic symptoms associated with depression. The overall score to be obtained with this instrument ranges from 25 to 100, where high scores indicate severe symptoms 17. We followed the standard instructions of the Zung and STAI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study indicated severe mental health problems among Chinese students. According to Zung (1965), a score of 50-60 from SDS indicates mild depression, a score of 60-70 indicates moderate depression, and a score of 70 and above indicates severe depression. The results of this study showed that 20.1% of the participants had mild depression, 14.1% had moderate depression, and 2% had severe depression.…”
Section: Chapter Eight: Conclusion Implications and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The five-factor ASSCS had an overall Cronbach' alpha of 0.939, which indicated high internal consistency of the scale. Deleting any of the items would reduce the APPENDIX E: SELF-RATING DEPRESSION SCALE Self-rating Depression Scale (Zung, 1965 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four psychological characteristics were assessed with standardized scales derived from the Dutch Self-Assessment Questionnaire (Van der Ploeg, 1989): anxiety (20 items), anger (10 items), depression (20 items) and optimism (8 items). The four scales represent adaptations of Spielberger's Trait Anxiety Inventory ( Van der Ploeg et αι., 1980;Spielberger, 1983), the Trait Anger Scale ( Van der Ploeg et al, 1982;Spielberger et al, 1983), Zung's Self-rating Depression Scale (Zung, 1965;Mook et al, 1989) and the Life Orientation Test (LOT, Scheier and Carver, 1987). Subjects were asked to rate themselves on a 4-point scale of frequency ("almost never" to "almost always").…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%