2013
DOI: 10.1162/neco_a_00424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Self-Organized Neural Comparator

Abstract: Learning algorithms need generally the ability to compare several streams of information. Neural learning architectures hence need a unit, a comparator, able to compare several inputs encoding either internal or external information, for instance, predictions and sensory readings. Without the possibility of comparing the values of predictions to actual sensory inputs, reward evaluation and supervised learning would not be possible. Comparators are usually not implemented explicitly. Necessary comparisons are c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most models for matching, recognition, and recall tasks therefore implement a content-independent computation of a match signal. Ludueña and Gros (2013) demonstrated that a relatively simple, self-organizing neural network can learn to detect coactivation in neuronal pools representing similar information with nonoverlapping codes, allowing for a match signal between sensory and memory information to emerge upon presentation. Match signals also emerge in models of associative memory that assume one-shot Hebbian learning of arbitrary information in the hippocampus.…”
Section: Models Of Storage and Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most models for matching, recognition, and recall tasks therefore implement a content-independent computation of a match signal. Ludueña and Gros (2013) demonstrated that a relatively simple, self-organizing neural network can learn to detect coactivation in neuronal pools representing similar information with nonoverlapping codes, allowing for a match signal between sensory and memory information to emerge upon presentation. Match signals also emerge in models of associative memory that assume one-shot Hebbian learning of arbitrary information in the hippocampus.…”
Section: Models Of Storage and Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of models of how sameness-relations might be computed have been proposed in the literature (Arena et al, 2013;Carpenter & Grossberg, 1987;Cope et al, 2018;Engel & Wang, 2011;Hasselmo & Wyble, 1997;J. S. Johnson, Spencer, Luck, & Schöner, 2009;Ludueña & Gros, 2013;Wen, Ulloa, Husain, Horwitz, & Contreras-Vidal, 2008). The underlying principles and assumptions vary substantially across models.…”
Section: Models Of Sameness/difference Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A promising example has been presented by Luduena and Gros (2013), who show that in an unsupervised feedforward neural network following an anti-Hebbian learning rule a comparatorfunction can emerge under strictly local rules through self-organization, which can signal the grade of similarity between unrelated input streams even in the presence of noise.…”
Section: Behavior In Timementioning
confidence: 99%